Table 6.
Outcome: New Drug Use
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | |
A. Reduced form: Drug receipt effect | |||
Residence in first author HRR | 0.0228** (0.0099) | 0.0217** (0.0099) | 0.0228** (0.0099) |
Residence in other author HRR | 0.0038 (0.0044) | 0.0044 (0.0050) | 0.0046 (0.0061) |
Residence in first author’s neighbor HRR | 0.0035 (0.0045) | ||
Residence in other author’s neighbor HRR | − 0.0028 (0.0028) | ||
B. Two-stage least squares | |||
Provider in first author HRR | 0.0293** (0.0127) | 0.0259** (0.0114) | 0.0263** (0.0115) |
Provider in other author HRR | 0.0056 (0.0058) | 0.0060 (0.0061) | 0.0065 (0.0061) |
Sample | |||
Author HRR only? | No | Yes | No |
Number of observations | 659,468 | 286,637 | 659,468 |
Reduced-form results report coefficients from three regressions where the outcome variable is new drug use and the key explanatory variables are indicators for whether a given patient resides in the same region as the study author (or in column 3, in a neighboring region). In panel B, the two-stage least squares results use patient residence variables as instrumental variables for whether the patient is treated in the author region. All regressions include drug-year fixed effects and HRR-cancer type fixed effects defined using three categories of cancer drugs: urologic, hematologic, and other (including breast, colon, lung, and brain). Standard errors clustered at the HRR-drug level shown in parentheses.
p < 0.10,
p < 0.05, and
p < 0.01.