Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Feb 3;6(3):886–894.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.018

Table V.

Clinician-Reported Agreement and Self-efficacy with EPR-3 Asthma Guidelines

Primary Care Clinicians Asthma Specialists
Panel A: Agreement, weighted % (SE) n Strongly agree Strongly agree P Valuea
Spirometry is essential for diagnosis 1638 35.5 (2.3) 77.6 (3.8) <.001
ICS are effective for persistent asthma 1633 48.3 (2.3) 76.0 (3.4) <.001
Asthma Action Plans are effective 1639 30.6 (2.1) 41.0 (4.1) .0258
Follow up visits for persistent asthma every 6 months 1639 48.9 (2.3) 68.8 (3.5) <.001
Assessing severity is necessary for initial therapy 1632 50.3 (2.4) 79.3 (3.3) <.001
Overall agreement index 1642 12.1 (1.4) 27.9 (3.9) <.001
Panel B: Asthma Self - efficacy, weighted % (SE) n Very confident Very confident
Confidence using spirometry 1636 37.0 (2.3) 92.8 (2.1) <.001
Confidence assessing severity 1635 49.4 (2.4) 81.3 (3.5) <.001
Confidence prescribing ICS 1642 65.2 (2.2) 91.1 (2.2) <.001
Confidence step ping up therapy 1641 64.5 (2.3) 89.5 (2.4) <.001
Confidence step ping down therapy 1639 49.8 (2.4) 87.0 (2.6) <.001
Overall self - efficacy index 1642 21.5 (2.1) 72.3 (3.9) <.001
Primary Care Clinicians Asthma Specialists
Panel C: Association between adherence and strong agreement and high self-efficacy, OR (95% CI)b n Strong agreement (vs other) High self-efficacy (vs. other) n Strong agreement (vs. other) High self-efficacy (vs other)
Provide Asthma Action Plan 1391 2.0 (1.1, 3.6)* 2.4 (1.3, 4.3)* 233 1.6 (0.7, 3.3) 1.1 (0.5, 2.5)
Document asthma control 1321 1.4 (0.8, 2.5) 1.8 (1.0, 3.0)* 226 0.8 (0.3, 2.1) 1.5 (0.6, 3.5)
Ask about ability to engage in normal activities 1392 1.7 (0.9, 3.2) 2.1 (1.2, 3.5)* 232 1.3 (0.4, 4.4) 1.5 (0.6, 4.3)
Ask about frequency of daytime symptoms 1398 1.5 (0.8, 2.9) 2.3 (1.3, 4.1)* 233 1.6 (0.4, 7.5) 3.9 (1.0, 16.0)
Ask about frequency of nighttime awakenings 1396 1.4 (0.8, 2.5) 1.7 (1.0, 2.9) 233 0.7 (0.2, 2.0) 2.7 (0.9, 7.8)
Ask about patient perception of control 1395 0.9 (0.5, 1.5) 1.9 (1.1, 3.3)* 233 1.6 (0.6, 4.3) 1.2 (0.4, 3.0)
Use a control assessment tool 1395 1.5 (0.8, 2.9) 1.7 (0.9, 3.0) 233 1.0 (0.5, 2.1) 1.3 (0.6, 2.9)
Ask about frequency of rescue inhaler use 1398 2.9 (1.6, 5.5)* 2.7 (1.5, 4.7)* 233 0.4 (0.1, 2.2) 3.0 (0.6, 14.4)
Ask about ED visit frequency 1398 1.3 (0.7, 2.3) 3.0 (1.8, 4.8)* 232 0.8 (0.3, 2.8) 2.9 (1.0, 8.4)
Ask about oral steroid frequency 1396 1.1 (0.6, 2.1) 4.3 (2.6, 7.1)* 232 0.7 (0.2, 2.8) 1.4 (0.4, 5.1)
Ask about home peak flow results 1396 2.0 (1.0, 4.0) 3.1 (1.6, 6.1)* 231 1.8 (0.7, 5.0) 2.4 (0.8, 7.6)
Perform spirometry 1378 2.1 (0.9, 4.7) 6.3 (3.0, 13.4)* 232 1.1 (0.5, 2.2) 4.3 (2.0, 9.0)*
Assess daily controller use for persistent asthma 1392 1.9 (1.1, 3.2)* 2.4 (1.4, 4.4)* 232 0.7 (0.2, 2.7) 2.0 (0.6, 6.6)
Repeated assessment of inhaler technique 1393 1.5 (0.7, 2.9) 2.8 (1.6, 5.0)* 233 1.5 (0.8, 3.1) 0.8 (0.4, 1.9)
Assess home triggers 1394 1.5 (0.9, 2.5) 3.3 (1.9, 5.5)* 233 0.8 (0.4, 1.7) 1.9 (0.9, 4.2)
Assess school or workplace triggers 1408 1.4 (0.8, 2.4) 4.1 (2.5, 6.9)* 233 0.8 (0.3, 1.7) 1.5 (0.7, 3.6)
Test for allergic sensitivity 1383 1.3 (0.5, 3.7) 6.0 (2.5, 14.4)* 233 1.1 (0.5, 2.4) 1.8 (0.9, 3.8)
*

P<.05.

a

Chi-square test for difference between primary care clinicians and asthma specialists.

b

Logistic regression models stratified by primary care clinicians and asthma specialists. Independent variables included agreement index (strong agreement versus all other responses) and self-efficacy index (high self-efficacy versus all other responses). See Supplemental Table e4 for logistic regression models with additional covariates.

CI: confidence interval; ED: emergency department; EPR-3: Expert Panel Report 3; ICS: inhaled corticosteroids; SE: standard error

Data Source: NCHS, National Asthma Survey of Physicians, 2012