Skip to main content
. 2018 May 11;9(5):564. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0618-6

Table 1.

The relationship between clinical histopathological features of OLK and expression of PRC1

Factors Number (n) Positive rate Intensity Staining score p value
Sex
 Male 14 53.43 ± 13.74 2.21 ± 0.58 111.93 ± 13.25 0.422
 Female 10 52.80 ± 11.08 2.20 ± 0.42 116.80 ± 15.89
Age (years)
 ≤60 16 54.31 ± 13.85 2.19 ± 0.54 115.19 ± 15.18 0.563
 >60 8 50.88 ± 9.45 2.25 ± 0.46 111.50 ± 12.91
Location
 Buccal 8 53.5 ± 17.07 2.13 ± 0.64 110.25 ± 18.28 0.627
 Tongue 10 51.50 ± 3.49 2.30 ± 0.48 114.60 ± 13.60
 Others 6 55.50 ± 8.55 2.17 ± 0.41 117.83 ± 9.85
Dysplasia
 Without 5 57.60 ± 19.32 1.80 ± 0.45 96.80 ± 4.60 0.000***
 Mild 7 48.57 ± 8.83 2.29 ± 0.49 107.71 ± 8.28
 Moderate 6 55.67 ± 7.66 2.17 ± 0.41 118.17 ± 5.81
 Severe 6 52.33 ± 14.29 2.50 ± 0.55 131.33 ± 8.55

Expression of PRC1 in OLK was not relevant to their sex, age, and location of lesions (p> 0.05) while exhibited a positive correlation with the degree of epithelial dysplasia (p= 0.000). Error bars, mean ± SD (n ≥ 5); ***p < 0.001; t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test.