Skip to main content
. 2018 May 11;9(5):564. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0618-6

Table 2.

The association between clinical histopathological features of OSCC and expression of PRC1

Factors Number (n) Positive rate Intensity Staining score p value
Sex
 Male 37 82.14 ± 8.23 2.68 ± 0.48 217.86 ± 33.48 0.881
 Female 17 83.59 ± 7.57 2.64 ± 0.49 219.41 ± 34.75
Age (years)
 ≤60 31 83.18 ± 7.76 2.64 ± 0.49 218.18 ± 37.45 0.930
 >60 23 82.55 ± 8.11 2.68 ± 0.48 219.09 ± 30.44
Location
 Buccal 10 80.30 ± 8.59 2.80 ± 0.42 223.20 ± 33.62 0.936
 Tongue 16 83.13 ± 8.19 2.60 ± 0.51 214.20 ± 35.46
 Gingival 12 82.25 ± 8.00 2.63 ± 0.52 214.38 ± 32.94
 Floor of oral 12 86.25 ± 7.82 2.63 ± 0.52 225.13 ± 35.59
 Others 4 82.67 ± 2.08 2.67 ± 0.58 219.67 ± 43.04
Differentiation
 Well 31 83.74 ± 7.74 2.44 ± 0.51 202.41 ± 32.49 0.003*
 Moderate 16 81.73 ± 7.12 2.87 ± 0.35 234.07 ± 27.29
 Poor 7 80.20 ± 9.66 3.00 ± 0.00 240.60 ± 28.96
T stage
 T1 20 82.06 ± 8.21 2.41 ± 0.51 194.53 ± 25.52 0.003*
 T2 10 82.60 ± 8.10 2.80 ± 0.42 230.20 ± 31.84
 T3 8 86.46 ± 5.94 2.55 ± 0.52 219.364 ± 39.45
 T4 16 79.56 ± 7.44 3.00 ± 0.00 239.67 ± 22.38
N (lymph node metastasis)
 N0 28 82.41 ± 8.29 2.82 ± 0.40 231.50 ± 29.26 0.004*
 N1N2 26 83.00 ± 7.27 2.48 ± 0.51 203.44 ± 33.49
Clinical stage
 I/II 33 82.19 ± 7.74 2.55 ± 0.51 206.71 ± 31.39 0.005*
 III/IV 21 83.75 ± 7.72 2.81 ± 0.40 235.69 ± 32.35

No statistical difference between PRC1 and sex, age, tumor location was found in patients with OSCC. However, increased PRC1 was significantly associated with poor differentiation, large tumor volume, lymph node metastasis and high-clinical stage (p< 0.05). Error bars, mean ± SD (n ≥ 4); *p < 0.05; t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test.