Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 12;144(6):1025–1035. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2625-5

Table 1.

The correlation between MLL2 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of Kazakh ESCC patients

Characteristics n MLL2 expression χ2 P
High (%) Low (%)
Specimen 16.465 < 0.001*
 Adjacent normal tissue 67 8 (11.9) 59 (88.1)
  ESCC 67 29 (43.3) 38 (56.7)
Gender 0.448 0.348
 Female 19 7 (36.8) 12 (63.2)
 Male 48 22 (45.8) 26 (54.2)
Age (years) 2.417 0.095
 > 60 35 12 (34.3) 23 (65.7)
 ≤ 60 32 17 (53.1) 15 (46.9)
TNM stage 4.424 0.037*
 I–II 54 20 (37.0) 34 (63.0)
 III 13 9 (69.2) 4 (30.8)
T classification 1.123 0.209
 T1–T2 28 10 (35.7) 18 (64.3)
 T3–T4 39 19 (48.7) 20 (51.3)
N classification 0.781 0.264
 No 41 16 (39.0) 25 (61.0)
 Yes 26 13 (50.0) 13 (50.0)
Differentiation 4.447 0.032*
 Well 18 4 (22.2) 14 (77.8)
 Moderately/poorly 49 25 (51.0) 24 (49.0)
Tumor size 4.195 0.035*
 < 4 35 11 (31.4) 24 (68.6)
 ≥ 4 32 18 (56.3) 14 (43.8)
Vascular invasion 2.2 0.118
 Negative 52 20 (38.5) 32 (61.5)
 Positive 15 9 (60.0) 6 (40.0)

*Statistically significant (P < 0.05); n number of cases; MLL2 Expression cases (Ratio); Χ2 Chi-square value