Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 19;23(3):175–182. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.02.007

Table 3.

Dosimetric results with SS-IMRT, CDR-VMAT and VDR-VMAT for organs at risk (OARs).

Mean range
SS-IMRT CDR-VMAT VDR-VMAT p Value
Mandible
D1cc 50.5 Gy (32.2–62.9) 52.15 (34.6–61.7) 51.45 (32–63) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p > 0.9999
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p = 0.0133
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p = 0.0133



Right parotid
Dmean 23.6 Gy (16.2–27.6) 22.7 Gy (14.8–25.9) 21.5 Gy (12.9–25.4) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p < 0.0001
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p < 0.0001
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p < 0.001
V30Gy 39% (30–46) 34.50% (19–40) 31.50% (17–37) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p = 0.0057
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p < 0.0001
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p = 0.0057



Left parotid
Dmean 23.6 Gy (19.8–26.4) 22.6 Gy (15.4–24.7) 21.2 Gy (15.1–24.5) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p < 0.0001
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p < 0.0001
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p < 0.001
V30Gy 40% (27–46) 33.50% (18–37) 29.50% (21–36) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p < 0.0001
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p < 0.0001
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p = 0.0065



Right submandibular gland
Dmean 44.2 Gy (24.7–62) 37.6 Gy (24.1–61.3) 34.5 Gy (24.1–63.1) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p < 0.0001
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p < 0.0001
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p = 0.0663



Left submandibular gland
Dmean 44.1 Gy (24.8–61.7) 36.7 Gy (24.6–67.9) 32.9 Gy (25.1–50.3) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p = 0.0003
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p < 0.0001
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p = 0.0237



Spinal cord
D0.1cc 40.8 Gy (36–55) 40.1 Gy (38.1–58.1) 39.5 Gy (37.8– 60.8) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p = 0.5807
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p = 0.2735
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p = 0.5807



Brainstem
D0.1cc 35.4 Gy (2.9–43.3) 30.9 Gy (5–45.1) 32.2 Gy (5–44.6) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p = 0.8965
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p = 0.3708
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p = 0.3088



Larynx
Dmean 46.5 Gy (38.9–59.1) 43.1 Gy (35.4–51.3) 39.5 Gy (35.2–46) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p = 0.0045
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p < 0.0001
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p = 0.0045
D1cc 63.5 Gy (53.3–67.7) 64.2 Gy (53.6–68.2) 65.7 Gy (52.9–67.5) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p = 0.8965
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p = 0.3708
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p = 0.3088



Thyroid
V45Gy 72.5% (20–100) 55% (6–100) 38% (7–100) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p = 0.056
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p = 0.0005
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p = 0.56



Esophagus
D1cc 40.5 Gy (20.7–61) 41 Gy (31.3–60.3) 34.9 Gy (23.9–58.8) IMRT vs. CDR-VMAT p > 0.9999
IMRT vs. VDR-VMAT p = 0.0133
CDR-VMAT vs. VDR-VMAT
p = 0.0133

Abbreviations: SS-IMRT: step and shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy; VDR-VMAT: varying dose rates volumetric-modulated arc therapy; CDR-VMAT: constant dose rate volumetric-modulated arc therapy.