Skip to main content
. 2018 May 11;30:34. doi: 10.1186/s40557-018-0240-1

Table 2.

Comparision of the parameters for HRV in the subjects

Resting Recovering
Variable Highlanders Lowlanders Highlanders Lowlanders
Time domain
 SDNNb 56.6(43–71.9) 50.8(35.1–80.7) 80.3(54.2–99.8) 62.7 (50.7–79)
 RMSSDc 47.3 (36.5–69) 37.9 (31.6–81.6) 48 (32.6–85.6) 32.2 (23.5–53.3)
 NN50c 63 (36–142) 63 (32–115) 81 (35–138) 27(11–75)
 pNN50%c 17.6(8.9-41.3) 18 (9–39) 22 (9.6–40.4) 6.3 (2.3–17.4)
Frequency domain
 LF powera 720 (450–1162) 763 (328–1262) 758 (446–2005) 383 (182–740)
 HF powerc 684(273–1268) 498 (278–1035) 487 (206–2048) 208 (63–798)
 LF 56.1 (43.3–62.9) 54.5 (37.9–69.5) 56.7 (46.7–74.5) 63.9 (46.8–75.9)
 HF 43.9 (37.1–56.7) 45.5 (30.5–62.1) 43.3 (25.5–53.3) 36.1 (24.1–53.2)
 Total powera 2659(1397–4528) 2199(1453-6124) 3662 (2232–6380) 1862 (860–3699)
 LF/HFb 1.28 (0.76–1.69) 1.30 (0.71–2.28) 1.18 (.87–2.92) 1.77 (0.88–3.14)

asignificant different in HRV during recovery between highlanders and lowlanders

bsignificant different in highlanders between resting and recovery

csignificant different in lowlanders between resting and recovery

Bold numbers indicate that the values are statistically significant