Table 2.
Women’s (n = 1153) and FCHVs’ (n = 159) assessments of MA success using the checklist are compared to CAC providers’ (n = 47) determinations based on standard of care
| Provider assessment MA successful | Provider assessment additional care needed | Total | PPV | NPV | Sn | Sp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | %a | n | %a | n | %a | % (95%, CI) | % (95% CI) | % (95% CI) | % (95% CI) | |
| Women’s Assessment | 90 (88, 92) | 49 (41, 57) | 92 (90, 93) | 44 (36, 51) | ||||||
| MA successful | 894 | 78 | 99 | 9 | 993 | 86 | ||||
| Additional care needed | 81 | 7 | 77 | 7 | 158 | 14 | ||||
| Total | 975 | 85 | 176 | 15 | 1151b | 100 | ||||
| FCHVs’ Assessment | 90 (88, 92) | 41 (34, 49) | 89 (87, 91) | 44 (36, 51) | ||||||
| MA successful | 868 | 75 | 99 | 9 | 967 | 84 | ||||
| Additional care neded | 109 | 9 | 77 | 7 | 186 | 16 | ||||
| Total | 977 | 85 | 176 | 15 | 1153 | 100 | ||||
PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, Sn sensitivity, Sp specificity
aNumbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding
b2 women missing self-assessment of success