Skip to main content
. 2018 May 12;17:88. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0839-4

Table 1.

Analysis of correlation between TIGAR or Met protein level and clinic parameters in 72 patients with NSCLC

Protein name TIGAR Met
Characteristics All cases Low High P-value All cases Low High P-value
Participants 72 35 37 72 49 23
Age 0.7538 0.3726
< 65 46 23 23 46 33 13
≥65 26 12 14 26 16 10
Sex 0.5040 0.4921
Female 26 14 12 26 19 7
Male 46 21 25 46 30 16
TNM stage 0.0190 0.0012
I 29 20 9 29 27 2
II 18 8 10 18 11 7
III 14 5 9 14 7 7
IV 11 2 9 11 4 7
Nodes metastasis 0.0005 0.0001
N0 45 29 16 45 38 7
N1–3 27 6 21 27 11 16
Distant metastasis 0.0283 0.0143
M0 61 33 28 61 45 16
M1 11 2 9 11 4 7
Cancer progression 0.0260 0.0625
No 33 18 15 33 24 9
Yes 21 5 16 21 10 11