Table 2.
Predictors of currently having a mentor at MGHa, b
| Bivariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes, n/N (%) | p-value | OR | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 152/209 (72.7) | 0.45 | Ref | ||
| Female | 146/192 (76.0) | 1.15 | 0.68–1.93 | 0.61 | |
| Race | |||||
| Non-minority | 276/372 (74.2) | 0.84 | Ref | ||
| Minority | 19/25 (76.0) | 0.99 | 0.35–2.82 | 0.99 | |
| Rank | |||||
| Instructor | 157/189 (83.1) | 0.002 | Ref | ||
| Assistant Professorc | 87/126 (69.0) | 0.40 | 0.22–0.73 | 0.002 | |
| Associate Professor | 29/46 (63.0) | 0.30 | 0.14–0.68 | 0.004 | |
| Professor | 25/39 (64.1) | 0.17 | 0.07–0.42 | < 0.001 | |
| Pathway | |||||
| Investigator | 158/177 (89.3) | < 0.001 | Ref | ||
| Non-investigator | 127/206 (61.7) | 0.15 | 0.08–0.27 | < 0.001 | |
aOutcome variable was assessed by asking the following question: “Do you currently have at least one person at Massachusetts General Hospital who you consider to be mentor?”
bThis analysis excluded those who noted they had a mentor in the past (but not currently)
cWhen Assistant Professors were used as the referent group, there was no statistically significant difference between Associate Professors and Assistant Professors (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.34–1.68) but there was a trend toward Professors less frequently having a current mentor than Assistant Professors (OR 0.43 95% CI 0.17–1.04)