Table 2.
Diversity estimation of the 16S rRNA gene libraries for the R- and S-samples.
| Sample | OTU number | Chao 1 index | Shannon index | Simpson index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | S | R | S | R | S | R | S | |
| L | 2007 ± 275 | 1492 ± 274 | 8704 ± 582 | 6947 ± 1464 | 7.41 ± 0.78 | 5.51 ± 1.20 | 0.96 ± 0.02 | 0.86 ± 0.08 |
| M | 1986 ± 268 | 1618 ± 246 | 9759 ± 1750∗ | 6557 ± 685∗∗ | 7.34 ± 0.85 | 5.70 ± 0.90 | 0.96 ± 0.03 | 0.86 ± 0.07 |
| H | 2089 ± 202 | 1698 ± 251 | 8338 ± 407 | 7234 ± 859 | 7.85 ± 0.71 | 6.50 ± 1.03 | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 0.91 ± 0.04 |
R: root samples; S: substrate samples; L: low influent TAN concentration group (0.75 mg/L); M: middle influent TAN concentration group (2.31 mg/L); H: high influent TAN concentration group (7.23 mg/L). Differences among the L, M, and H groups were tested using one-way ANOVA. Different characters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Differences between the R- and S-samples of each group were determined using Student's t-test. “∗” and “∗∗” indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) (means ± SD, n = 3).