Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 29;2018:7819840. doi: 10.1155/2018/7819840

Table 2.

Diversity estimation of the 16S rRNA gene libraries for the R- and S-samples.

Sample OTU number Chao 1 index Shannon index Simpson index
R S R S R S R S
L 2007 ± 275 1492 ± 274 8704 ± 582 6947 ± 1464 7.41 ± 0.78 5.51 ± 1.20 0.96 ± 0.02 0.86 ± 0.08
M 1986 ± 268 1618 ± 246 9759 ± 1750 6557 ± 685∗∗ 7.34 ± 0.85 5.70 ± 0.90 0.96 ± 0.03 0.86 ± 0.07
H 2089 ± 202 1698 ± 251 8338 ± 407 7234 ± 859 7.85 ± 0.71 6.50 ± 1.03 0.97 ± 0.02 0.91 ± 0.04

R: root samples; S: substrate samples; L: low influent TAN concentration group (0.75 mg/L); M: middle influent TAN concentration group (2.31 mg/L); H: high influent TAN concentration group (7.23 mg/L). Differences among the L, M, and H groups were tested using one-way ANOVA. Different characters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Differences between the R- and S-samples of each group were determined using Student's t-test. “∗” and “∗∗” indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) (means ± SD, n = 3).