Skip to main content
. 2018 May 3;59(4):524–538. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.4.524

Table 1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria.

Study components Inclusion Exclusion
Participants Adults Children (age ≤18 years)
Pathology A pathology of spondylolisthesis, spondylosis (degenerative disease) A pathology of deformity, trauma, infection, inflammatory disease, or tumor
Interventions Posterior lumbar/lumbosacral spinal fusion (including transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion) utilizing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation Decompression only without fusion
Fusions extended to cervical and thoracic spine
Stand-alone anterior or posterior fusion
Presacral (axial) anterior fusion
Posterior instrumentation with facet screws or interspinous process devices
Unilateral instrumentation
Robot-assisted instrumentation
Mini-open instrumentation*
Mixed instrumentation
Comparator Conventional open pedicle screw instrumented fusion
Study outcomes Clinical outcomes for pain and function, fusion rate, subsequent surgery, complications, and perioperative surgical data Other radiographic measures (excluding fusion): alignment, range of motion, etc.
Nonclinical outcomes
Study design Randomized controlled trials Retrospective cohort studies
Controlled clinical trials Case-control studies
Prospective cohort studies Case series
Case reports
Nonclinical studies
Publication Studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals Abstracts, editorials, letters
Duplicate publications of the same study that do not report on different outcomes
Single-center reports from multicenter trials
Studies reporting on the technical aspects of the surgery
White papers or narrative reviews
Articles identified as preliminary reports when results are published in later versions

*Conventional pedicle screws were instrumented through a mini-open approach without use of percutaneous pedicle screw systems.