Skip to main content
. 2018 May 7;9:307. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00307

Table 2.

Log(NT-proBNP) and global brain volumes in the CARDIA brain magnetic resonance imaging sample.

Dependent variable βa 95% CI p-Value
Total brain volume (mL)
Model 1 −2.73 −5.69, 0.23 0.071
Model 2 −2.99 −5.98, −0.0047 0.050
Model 3 −2.31 −5.50, 0.89 0.156

Total gray matter (mL)
Model 1 −3.41 −5.63, −1.19 0.003
Model 2 −3.44 −5.68, −1.20 0.003
Model 3 −2.93 −5.32, −0.53 0.017

Total white matter (mL)
Model 1 0.68 −1.84, 3.19 0.60
Model 2 0.45 −2.13, 3.029 0.73
Model 3 0.62 −2.14, 3.38 0.66

Abnormal white matter loadb
Model 1 0.02 −0.30, 0.34 0.88
Model 2 −0.12 −0.46, 0.22 0.50
Model 3 −0.02 −0.38, 0.34 0.92

White matter integrityc
Model 1 −0.001 −3.48, 0.0009 0.25
Model 2 −0.001 −3.34, 0.001 0.30
Model 3 −0.0007 −0.003, 0.002 0.57

Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, race, and intracranial volume.

Model 2: Model 1 covariates + smoking status, anti-hypertension medication use, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, cardiovascular history, renal history, body mass index, total cholesterol, glomerular filtration rate, education, exam center.

Model 3: Model 2 covariates + cardiac output.

aCoefficient represents the difference in brain tissue volume (milliliter) corresponding to 1 unit increase in logNT-proBNP (picograms/milliliter).

bLogistic regression models with outcome as dichotomous variable split into high (top 15% of cohort) versus low (bottom 85% of cohort).

cMeasured by fractional anisotropy.