Table 2.
Dependent variable | βa | 95% CI | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Total brain volume (mL) | |||
Model 1 | −2.73 | −5.69, 0.23 | 0.071 |
Model 2 | −2.99 | −5.98, −0.0047 | 0.050 |
Model 3 | −2.31 | −5.50, 0.89 | 0.156 |
Total gray matter (mL) | |||
Model 1 | −3.41 | −5.63, −1.19 | 0.003 |
Model 2 | −3.44 | −5.68, −1.20 | 0.003 |
Model 3 | −2.93 | −5.32, −0.53 | 0.017 |
Total white matter (mL) | |||
Model 1 | 0.68 | −1.84, 3.19 | 0.60 |
Model 2 | 0.45 | −2.13, 3.029 | 0.73 |
Model 3 | 0.62 | −2.14, 3.38 | 0.66 |
Abnormal white matter loadb | |||
Model 1 | 0.02 | −0.30, 0.34 | 0.88 |
Model 2 | −0.12 | −0.46, 0.22 | 0.50 |
Model 3 | −0.02 | −0.38, 0.34 | 0.92 |
White matter integrityc | |||
Model 1 | −0.001 | −3.48, 0.0009 | 0.25 |
Model 2 | −0.001 | −3.34, 0.001 | 0.30 |
Model 3 | −0.0007 | −0.003, 0.002 | 0.57 |
Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, race, and intracranial volume.
Model 2: Model 1 covariates + smoking status, anti-hypertension medication use, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, cardiovascular history, renal history, body mass index, total cholesterol, glomerular filtration rate, education, exam center.
Model 3: Model 2 covariates + cardiac output.
aCoefficient represents the difference in brain tissue volume (milliliter) corresponding to 1 unit increase in logNT-proBNP (picograms/milliliter).
bLogistic regression models with outcome as dichotomous variable split into high (top 15% of cohort) versus low (bottom 85% of cohort).
cMeasured by fractional anisotropy.