Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 6;6(3):428–438. doi: 10.1177/2050640617731262

Table 3.

Comparison of different management approach groups.

Variable All patients n = 350 LC-IOC-first n = 118 ERCP-first n = 232 p value
Patient characteristics
 Age (year), mean (SD) 65.2 (17.9) 64.9 (17.4) 65.4 (18.2) 0.777
 Female; n (%) 222 (63.4) 76 (64.4) 146 (62.9) 0.786
 ASA grade 0.429
 I–II 165 (47.2) 45 (38.5) 12 (52.2)
 III–IV 185 (52.8) 73 (61.5) 11 (47.8)
Preoperative diagnosis
 Choledocholithiasis (CBDS on US/CT) 133 (38) 5 (4.5) 128 (55.2) 0.000
 Acute cholecystitis, n (%) 101 (28.9) 45 (38.1) 56 (24.1) 0.006
 Ascending cholangitis, n (%) 56 (16) 9 (7.7) 47 (20.5) 0.002
 Acute biliary pancreatitis, n (%) 63 (18) 25 (21.1) 38 (16.4) 0.268
Predictors
 Preoperative bilirubin (µmol/l), mean (SD) 74.8 (63.3) 50.9 (47.9) 86.9 (66.7) 0.000
 Dilated CBDS on US >6 mm, n (%) 293 (83.7) 70 (59.3) 223 (96.1) 0.000
 CBD diameter (mm), mean (SD) 10.17 (4.2) 6.88 (2.3) 11.8 (3.9) 0.000
 VUHI ≥ 4.7, n (%) 239 (68.3) 34 (28.8) 205 (88.4) 0.000
Outcomes
 CBDS detected, n (%) 226 (64.6) 35 (29.7) 191 (82.3) 0.000
 CBD pathology (stones + strictures), n (%) 240 (68.6) 35 (29.7) 205 (88.4) 0.000
 Duration from intervention to end of hospital treatment 6.89 (8.62) 4.67 (5.78) 8.03 (9.57) 0.000

LC-IOC: laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography; ERCP: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; VUHI: Vilnius University Hospital Index; CBDS: common bile duct stones; US: ultrasound; CT: computed tomography; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation. Statistically significant values are typed in bold.