Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 20;6(3):454–462. doi: 10.1177/2050640617733923

Table 4.

Adverse events.

Adverse events, n (%) Underwater polypectomies n = 195 Gas insufflation polypectomies n = 186 p Value
Overall 0.369
 Immediate bleeding 14 (7.2) 22 (11.8)
 Delayed bleedinga 2 (1.0) 1 (0.5)
Immediate bleeding
 Sessile and flat polyps,  overall, n (%) 11 (10.2) n = 108 12 (10.7) n = 112 0.898
  6–9 mm 1 (3.7) n = 27 1 (2.9) n = 35  >0.999
  10–19 mm 5 (7.9) n = 63 9 (15.5) n = 58 0.193
  ≥20 mm 5 (27.8) n = 18 2 (10.5) n = 19 0.232
 Pedunculated polyps,  overall, n (%) 3 (3.4) n = 87 10 (13.5) n = 74 0.019
  6–19 mm 1 (1.5) n = 65 7 (11.1) n = 63 0.031
  ≥20 mm 2 (9.1) n = 22 3 (27.3) n = 11 0.304
Management
 Hemoclip use,  overall, n (%) 14 (7.2) 22 (11.8) 0.121
  Sessile and flat polyps,  overall, n (%) 10 (9.3) 12 (10.7) 0.719
  Pedunculated polyps, n (%) 4 (4.6) 10 (13.5) 0.045
  6–19 mm 2 (3.1) 7 (11.1) 0.093
  ≥20 mm 2 (9.1) 3 (27.3) 0.304
 Use of argon plasma  coagulation,b n (%) 4 (21.1) 1 (4.3) 0.158

Polyp morphology assignment: flat, 0-IIa and 0-IIb; sessile, 0-Is; pedunculated, 0-Ip.13 For categorical variables, p values were obtained using Chi Square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

a

Delayed bleeding occurred in two underwater polypectomy resections (one flat and one pedunculated polyp, respectively, each with a diameter of 15 mm) and in one gas insufflation polypectomy resection (pedunculated polyp with a diameter of 10 mm).

b

All sessile or flat polyps.