Information Provided |
Clear information (5 of 6 Sites) |
“Labels were clear and easy to understand.”
|
Concise information (2 of 6 Sites) |
“Really good, clear and quality labelling.”
|
Missing information (3 of 6 Sites) |
“We used to list fat, salt and sugar… I think sometimes people just get a bit confused by it all”
|
|
“People started to ask about salt, started to ask about sugar…”
|
Implementation Issues |
Issues in getting calorie information (4 of 6 Sites) |
“What had always stopped us in the past was the chefs and their freedom to be chefs”
|
Time-consuming to implement (6 of 6 sites) |
“The blocker for us is getting the calories of the meals that they make on site and being accurate with that”
|
Easy to run (6 of 6 sites) |
“ There is a lot of sending data which is very time consuming”
|
|
“Once you just get on with it and when you start to understand, actually its fine”
|
Feedback from Customers |
Addition of information (5 of 6 sites) |
“Because we were adding information for people and not taking anything away from them, I think that was a positive thing”
|
Awareness of labels (6 of 6 sites) |
“…it was noticed and people were pleased to see it. They were surprised actually and it was driving them to make difficult choices.”
|
|
“Nobody really commented on it either way… it certainly wasn’t an issue.”
|