Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 19;31(1):30–38. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.3188

Table 1.

Characteristics of Patients With Clinical Stage II/III and Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Received Neoadjuvant Therapy

Characteristic Adjuvant Therapy
All Patients (N = 1,193)
Yes (n = 990)
No (n = 203)
No. % No. % No. %
Age at diagnosis, years
    Median 55 65 57
    Range 22-93 21-89 21-93
    < 50 300 30 29 14 329 27
    50-64 451 46 69 34 520 44
    65-74 197 20 53 26 250 21
    75+ 42 4 52 26 94 8
Sex
    Male 602 61 114 56 716 60
    Female 388 39 89 44 477 40
Racial/ethnic background
    White Non-Hispanic 789 80 166 82 955 80
    African American Non-Hispanic 57 6 14 7 71 6
    Asian Non-Hispanic 63 6 4 2 67 6
    Other Non-Hispanic 7 < 1 1 < 1 8 < 1
    Hispanic 71 7 17 8 88 7
    Unknown 3 < 1 1 < 1 4 < 1
Charlson comorbidity index
    0 760 77 123 61 883 74
    1 154 15 50 25 204 17
    2 55 6 16 8 71 6
    3+ 21 2 14 7 35 3
ECOG performance status
    0 843 85 141 69 984 82
    1 71 7 34 17 105 9
    2+ 15 2 7 3 22 2
    Unknown 61 6 21 10 82 7
Center
    A 45 5 17 8 62 5
    B 85 9 12 6 97 8
    C 48 5 9 4 57 5
    D 298 30 30 15 328 27
    E 43 4 17 8 60 5
    F 69 7 50 25 119 10
    G 338 34 56 28 394 33
    H 64 6 12 6 76 6
Insurance
    Private 652 66 74 36 726 61
    Medicare 236 24 92 45 328 27
    Medicaid/Indigent 59 6 27 13 86 7
    Other 31 3 5 2 36 3
    Unknown 12 1 5 2 17 1
Household income
    < 40K 355 36 84 41 439 37
    40 to < 60K 304 31 63 31 367 31
    60 to < 80K 187 19 30 15 217 18
    ≥ 80K 102 10 16 8 118 10
    Unknown 42 4 10 5 52 4
Primary site
    Rectosigmoid junction* 72 7 12 6 84 7
    Rectum, NOS 918 93 191 94 1109 93
Clinical TNM stage
    Locally advanced 37 4 11 5 48 4
    II 290 29 76 37 366 31
    III 663 67 116 57 779 65
Pathologic TNM stage
    Locally advanced 12 1 8 4 20 2
    0 190 19 51 25 241 20
    I 254 26 52 26 306 26
    II 232 23 47 23 279 23
    III 302 31 45 22 347 29
Clinical to pathologic stage: Was patient downstaged/upstaged?
    Complete responders (stage 0) 190 19 51 25 241 20
    Downstaged (from stage II to I or from stage III to II) 211 21 56 28 267 22
    Downstaged (from stage III to I) 175 18 21 10 196 16
    Upstaged (from stage II to III) 64 6 7 3 71 6
    No change in stage 303 31 52 26 355 30
Grade at diagnosis
    1 44 4 15 7 59 5
    2 745 75 142 70 887 74
    3 71 7 9 5 80 7
    Unknown 110 11 34 17 144 12
    NA 20 2 3 1 23 1
Lymphovascular invasion at primary surgery
    No 642 65 119 59 761 64
    Yes 140 14 28 14 168 14
    Unknown 130 13 27 13 157 13
    NA 78 8 29 14 107 9
Perineural invasion at primary surgery
    No 518 52 109 54 627 53
    Yes 107 11 18 9 125 10
    Unknown 286 29 46 23 331 28
    NA 80 8 30 15 110 9
Any margins (proximal, distal or radial)
    Negative 714 72 125 62 839 70
    Positive/close 69 7 21 10 90 8
    NA 207 21 57 28 264 22
Distance of tumor from anal verge, cm
    < 6 356 36 87 43 443 37
    6-8 304 31 42 21 346 29
    >8 275 28 56 28 331 28
    Unknown 55 5 18 8 73 6
CEA after surgery for patients with abnormal CEA at baseline§
    Normal 167 17 31 15 198 17
    Abnormal 32 3 10 5 42 4
    No CEA test after surgery 24 2 15 7 39 3
    NA 767 77 147 72 914 76
Surgical procedure
    LAR 670 68 116 57 786 66
    APR 209 21 65 32 274 23
    Total proctocolectomy 24 2 8 4 32 3
    Total pelvic exenteration 9 1 3 1 12 1
    Partial pelvic exenteration 2 < 1 1 < 1 3 < 1
    Proctectomy 61 6 3 1 64 5
Surgical complications
    Anastomosis leak/peritonitis 4 < 1 6 3 10 < 1
    Postoperative bleeding 1 < 1 0 0 1 < 1
    Re-operation bowel obstruction 3 < 3 0 0 3 < 1
    Re-operation wound infection 35 4 24 12 59 5
Other surgical procedures
    Ileostomy 32 3 9 4 41 3
    Colostomy 59 6 20 10 79 7
    Closure of ileostomy/colostomy 587 59 76 37 663 56
    Endoscopic stenting 9 1 6 3 15 1
    Surgical drainage of abscess 9 1 6 3 15 1

NOTE. Patients presented to NCCN institutions between September 2005 and December 2010 and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pelvic radiation.

Abbreviations: APR, abdominoperineal resection; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LAR, low anterior resection; NA, not applicable; NOS, not otherwise specified.

*

Seventy-six (90%) treated as rectal, four (5%) treated as colon, four treated as indeterminate.

Locally advanced means no evidence of metastatic disease, but staging was not available. Patients who were not able to be staged clinically and pathologically were not included in this study.

Sixty-three of the patients were excluded from the downstaged/upstaged analyses, as these patients either had clinical TNM stage or a pathologic TNM stage of locally advanced, but stage of disease not further specified.

§

Baseline was defined as a CEA test before neoadjuvant therapy. NA (not applicable) represents patients who did not have abnormal CEA at baseline (n = 913 with normal CEA at baseline; n = 1 unknown if CEA test was done).

Represents procedures that were performed after the primary rectal surgery.