Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 24;39(19):1709–1723. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy056

Table 3.

Analysis of primary and secondary outcomes according to treatment exposure

No. of patients No. of outcomes P-valuea No. of patient days Incidence rate per 100 patient days (95% CI) CML estimate of rate ratio (95% CI) P-valueb
Haemorrhagic complication
 TA 66 17 <0.01 482 3.53 (2.05–5.65) 10.31 (3.67–35.70) <0.01
 No TA 71 4 1169 0.34 (0.09–0.88)
Thromboembolic complication
 TA 66 1 0.06 482 0.21 (0.01–1.15) 0.35 (0.02–2.24) 0.34
 No TA 71 7 1169 0.60 (0.24–1.23)
Composite endpoint
 TA 66 18 0.09 482 3.73 (2.21–5.90) 3.97 (1.88–8.69) <0.01
 No TA 71 11 1169 0.94 (0.47–1.68)

Significant P-values are presented in bold. For definitions of haemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications please see Methods.

CI, confidence interval; CML, conditional maximum likelihood; No, number; No TA, i.e. either no antithrombotic medication received during hospital stay or administration of heparins [unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH)] in prophylactic dosing for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE); TA, i.e. either restarted therapeutic anticoagulation using VKA (scored on first day with INR levels ≥ 1.5), continuous or subcutaneous heparinization (targeting a therapeutic range of aPTT extended by 1.5–2.5) and or full weight adjusted dosing of LMWH (targeting 0.5–.0 anti-Xa units/mL).

a

Compared using the Pearson's χ2 or the Fisher’s exact test as appropriate.

b

Compared using the Mid-P exact test.