Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 9;38(2):333–346. doi: 10.1177/0271678X17692599

Table 1.

BPNDAIF and BPNDLOGAN correlations using the SuperDPA methods.

Correlation
ICC
%Relative error
Relative error SD (%)
Regression coeff
ALL HABMAB CRBGM ALL HABMAB CRBGM ALL HABMAB CRBGM ALL HABMAB CRBGM ALL HAB MAB CRBGM
Thalamus 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.94 0.92 0.99 −0.53 6.37 −6.73 10.27 7.50 5.86 0.79 0.95 1.07
Cingulate 0.97 0.94 1.00 0.95 0.83 1.00 7.47 15.91 −5.67 19.28 13.69 8.97 0.81 0.97 1.13
Frontal 0.98 0.92 1.00 0.96 0.83 1.00 7.16 16.89 −3.19 19.61 15.08 5.72 0.73 0.97 0.89
Parietal 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.93 0.8 1.00 15.32 27.03 1.22 27.25 17.14 12.72 0.76 1.00 0.96
Occipital 0.90 0.96 1.00 0.88 0.83 1.00 21.95 112.52 106.30 33.86 191.23 294.73 0.79 1.00 0.96
Hipp 0.90 0.96 0.99 0.88 0.88 0.98 15.12 41.41 −6.75 42.20 34.66 47.91 0.69 0.88 0.90
WM 0.87 0.85 0.98 0.83 0.78 0.96 38.66 97.46 −34.32 118.40 170.58 37.28 0.60 0.79 0.78
Mean 0.94 0.93 0.99 0.91 0.84 0.99 15.17 45.37 23.46 38.70 64.27 59.03 0.74 0.94 0.96
SD 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.01 12.70 42.38 45.17 36.67 80.33 105.25 0.07 0.08 0.11

Note: Correlation coefficients (r), ICC values, relative error (%), relative error SD (%) and regression coefficients between BPNDAIF and BPNDLOGAN. The latter are estimated using SuperDPAALL, SuperDPAHAB/MAB and CRBGM (n = 10, 7 HABs + 3 MABs). Relative error is calculated against BPNDAIF.