Table 1.
Study | Country | Follow-up (mo) | Silicone stent (+) |
Silicone stent (-) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Duration (mo) | Success rate (%) | Number | Succes rate (%) | |||
Harugop et al. (2008) [26] | India | 16.3 | 50 | 3 | 96.0 | 240 | 93.3 |
Smirnov et al. (2008) [27] | America | 6 | 23 | 2 | 78.0 | 23 | 100.0 |
Kakkar et al. (2008) [28] | India | 2.5 | 20 | 1.5 | 85.0 | 20 | 90.0 |
Unlu et al. (2009) [19] | Turkey | 97 | 19 | 2 | 84.2 | 19 | 94.7 |
Al-Qahtani et al. (2012) [21] | Saudi Arabia | 12 | 92 | 4 | 96.0 | 81 | 91.0 |
Chong et al. (2013) [29] | China | 12 | 63 | 2 | 96.8 | 65 | 95.3 |
Shashidhar et al. (2014) [30] | India | 6 | 32 | 1.5 | 93.8 | 30 | 86.7 |
Reddy et al. (2015) [31] | India | 6 | 10 | 1.5 | 90.0 | 10 | 80.0 |
Fayers et al. (2016) [32] | Canada | 12 | 152 | 3 | 94.7 | 148 | 87.8 |
Rao et al. (2016) [33] | India | 6 | 25 | 3 | 92.0 | 25 | 84.0 |
Ahmad et al. (2016) [34] | India | 12 | 15 | 1.5 | 93.3 | 15 | 86.6 |
Smitha et al. (2016) [35] | India | 6 | 30 | 1.5 | 85.0 | 30 | 90.0 |