Skip to main content
. 2018 May 11;6:e4748. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4748

Table 4. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of chlorotypes for populations and population groups of T. himalayanum.

Regions Source variation d.f. SS VC Variation (%) FST
Whole distribution Among populations 19 695.940 3.089 89.43
Within populations 218 79.585 0.365 10.57
Total 237 775.525 3.453 0.894*
EH group Among populations 6 186.249 3.253 97.74
Within populations 63 4.737 0.075 2.26
Total 69 190.986 3.328 0.977*
HM group Among populations 4 27.756 0.470 39.66
Within populations 64 45.794 0.716 60.34
Total 68 73.551 1.186 0.397*
NHM group Among populations 7 358.340 4.269 93.04
Within populations 91 29.054 0.319 3.96
Total 98 387.394 4.588 0.930*
EH group, HM group versus NHM group Among groups 1 59.032 0.446 16.20
NHM group Among populations within groups 10 214.005 1.907 69.35
Within populations 127 50.531 0.398 14.46
Total 138 323.568 2.752 0.855*

Notes:

*

p < 0.001.

d.f., degree of freedom; SS, sum of squares; VC, variance component.