Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Early Hum Dev. 2017 May 23;111:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.05.006

Table 5.

Significant associations between early motor repertoire and language using multivariable regression analyses adjusted for sex, gestational age and socio-economic status

Language test Predictors B (95 % CI) beta R2 p model
Early motor repertoire at 3 months
AWST-R *1 MC 6.1 (-1.05; 13.367) 0.363 0.358 0.029
NVT composite *1 MC 4.5 (-0.908; 9.812) 0.391 0.153 0.098*5
HAWIK subscale *2 MC 3.1 (1.061; 5.106) 0.628 0.395 0.005
TROG items*2 MC 3.5 (-0.539; 7.572) 0.406 0.294 0.074*5
Early motor repertoire at 5 months
AWST-R *3 MOS (points) 1.0 (0.164; 1.830) 0.486 0.504 0.007
PPVT-III items *3 MC 20.0 (-3.772; 43.172) 0.406 0.165 0.094*5
HAWIK subscale *4 MOS (points) P 0.3 (0.164; 0.490)
-3.5 (-5.076; -1.862)
0.628
-0.677
0.688 0.000

Key: CI, confidence interval; MC, movement character; FMs, fidgety movements; MOS (points), Motor Optimality Score in points; P, postural patterns; AWST-R, Aktiver Wortschatztest - Revision; NVT, Noun-Verb Test; PPVT, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, third edition; HAWIK, Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Kinder, fourth edition; TROG, Test for Reception of Grammar - Deutsch

*1

MC was included in the model

*2

MOS (points), FMs and MC were included in the model

*3

MOS (points) and MC were included in the model

*4

MOS (points), FMs, postural patterns were included in the model

*5

0.05 ≤ p < 0.1, predictor remained in the model