Table 3.
Individual-Level and Co-Twin Control Analyses of Age-29 MPQ Normal-Range Personality Traits and Age-34 DAS Romantic Relationship Satisfaction
Co-Twin Control Models
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual-Level Models | Twin Difference Effects | ||||
|
|||||
Beta (SE) | p value | Beta (SE) | p value | ||
MPQ (age 29) | Stress reaction | −0.12 (.04) | .003 | −0.05 (.07) | .452 |
Alienation | −0.20 (.05) | < .001 | −0.21 (.08) | .008 | |
Aggression | −0.17 (.05) | .002 | −0.08 (.09) | .396 | |
Well being | 0.20 (.04) | < .001 | 0.02 (.08) | .793 | |
Control | 0.12 (.05) | .014 | 0.22 (.07) | .002 | |
Harm avoidance | 0.05 (.04) | .248 | – | – |
Notes. Results of individual-level linear mixed models (LMMs) and co-twin control models. Individual-level analyses examined associations between normal-range personality, measured using the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ), at age 29 and romantic relationship satisfaction, measured using a brief version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), at age 34; individual-level analyses consider twins as individuals and were conducted in the full sample, N = 230 twins, and models included random intercepts at the twin-pair level to account for the interdependence of the twin data. Significant individual-level associations were followed up using co-twin control analyses to examine twin difference effects (co-twin control analyses were not conducted for nonsignificant individual-level associations, noted in the table with a dash); co-twin control analyses consider differences within a twin pair and were conducted in the sample of intact twin pairs, n = 206 twins (from 103 intact twin pairs), with random intercepts at the twin-pair level to account for the twin data. All models included participant age and sex as covariates.