Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 May;127(4):339–347. doi: 10.1037/abn0000343

Table 3.

Individual-Level and Co-Twin Control Analyses of Age-29 MPQ Normal-Range Personality Traits and Age-34 DAS Romantic Relationship Satisfaction

Co-Twin Control Models
Individual-Level Models Twin Difference Effects

Beta (SE) p value Beta (SE) p value
MPQ (age 29) Stress reaction −0.12 (.04) .003 −0.05 (.07) .452
Alienation −0.20 (.05) < .001 −0.21 (.08) .008
Aggression −0.17 (.05) .002 −0.08 (.09) .396
Well being 0.20 (.04) < .001 0.02 (.08) .793
Control 0.12 (.05) .014 0.22 (.07) .002
Harm avoidance 0.05 (.04) .248

Notes. Results of individual-level linear mixed models (LMMs) and co-twin control models. Individual-level analyses examined associations between normal-range personality, measured using the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ), at age 29 and romantic relationship satisfaction, measured using a brief version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), at age 34; individual-level analyses consider twins as individuals and were conducted in the full sample, N = 230 twins, and models included random intercepts at the twin-pair level to account for the interdependence of the twin data. Significant individual-level associations were followed up using co-twin control analyses to examine twin difference effects (co-twin control analyses were not conducted for nonsignificant individual-level associations, noted in the table with a dash); co-twin control analyses consider differences within a twin pair and were conducted in the sample of intact twin pairs, n = 206 twins (from 103 intact twin pairs), with random intercepts at the twin-pair level to account for the twin data. All models included participant age and sex as covariates.