Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 May;11(5):e006408. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006408

Minimally Invasive Delivery of Hydrogel-Encapsulated Amiodarone to the Epicardium Reduces Atrial Fibrillation

Jose R Garcia 1,*, Peter F Campbell 2,*, Gautam Kumar 3,4, Jonathan J Langberg 3,5, Liliana Cesar 6, Juline N Deppen 3,7, Eric Y Shin 3, Neal K Bhatia 3, Lanfang Wang 3, Kai Xu 3, Frank Schneider 8, Brian Robinson 8, Andrés J García 1, Rebecca D Levit 3
PMCID: PMC5951400  NIHMSID: NIHMS955017  PMID: 29748197

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. While treatment options for AF exist, many patients cannot be maintained in normal sinus rhythm. Amiodarone is an effective medication for AF but has limited clinical utility due to off-target tissue toxicity.

Methods and Results

Here, we use a pig model of AF to test the efficacy of an amiodarone-containing poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogel. The gel is placed directly on the atrial epicardium through the pericardial space in a minimally invasive procedure using a specially designed catheter. Implantation of amiodarone-containing gel significantly reduced the duration of sustained AF at 21 and 28 days; inducibility of AF was reduced 14 and 21 days post-delivery. Off-target organ drug levels in the liver, lungs, thyroid, and fat were significantly reduced in animals treated with epicardial amiodarone gel compared to systemic controls in small animal distribution studies.

Conclusions

The pericardium is an underutilized therapeutic site and may be a new treatment strategy for AF and other cardiovascular diseases.

Journal Subject Terms: atrial fibrillation, arrhythmia, pericardium, amiodarone, epicardial, hydrogel, device

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a disease of disordered electrical conduction of the cardiac atria and is the most common cardiac arrhythmia1. It affects 33 million people worldwide and 6 million in the United States, a number expected to double by 20302. AF contributes significantly to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs with annual healthcare expenditures of $33 billion in 20133, 4. AF caused 130,000 deaths in 20132. AF patients are 2 to 10 times more likely to have embolic strokes originating from the fibrillating atria2. The pathophysiology of AF is complex and difficult to treat. Heart disease as well as systemic diseases lead to foci of over-excitable atrial cardiomyocytes as well as shortening of atrial cardiomyocyte action potential durations propagation of rapid conduction5. Together, these changes foster multiple random propagating wavelets, focal electrical discharges, and localized reentrant activity that prevent coordinated atrial contraction6.

There are several medications to control atrial rhythm in patients with AF, but none have shown a mortality benefit, due in part to the poor success at achieving normal sinus rhythm (NSR)79. Clinical trials have also shown improved quality of life with restoration of NSR when achievable10, 11. Some rhythm control medications increase risk of arrhythmia, heart failure, or death and are contraindicated in many patients with cardiac disease (ironically, the largest population with AF)1. Due to the low success rates and toxicity, only 16% of patients with AF are treated with rhythm control strategy12. Invasive procedures such as AF ablation are available for patients with symptoms refractory to medical treatment but the outcomes are poor for more advanced disease stages (persistent AF)13.

Amiodarone is a lipophilic medication approved in the United States for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias and used off-label for the treatment of AF14. Amiodarone prolongs atrial refractoriness and action potential duration, reducing early excitation in both normal and diseased hearts15. In a recent Cochrane analysis, amiodarone had the lowest number needed to treat (NNT), 3, to prevent recurrence of AF and significantly reduced the recurrence compared to dronedarone and sotalol8. Amiodarone is an effective medication but its use is associated with significant off-target tissue toxicity. Off-target tissue levels are estimated to be 10 to 500 times higher than cardiac levels in patients taking chronic amiodarone16, 17. Risk of pulmonary fibrosis, thyroid toxicity, and liver dysfunction range from 18–75% of patients taking chronic amiodarone16, 18. Thus, amiodarone is recommended only as an agent of last resort by American, European, and Canadian guidelines19.

Recently, we described a catheter-based technique using a novel device to deliver hydrogels to the cardiac epicardium under fluoroscopic guidance20. This delivery technique creates a temporary compartment on the heart’s surface for hydrogel delivery and in situ polymerization allowing precise localization and gelation. This technique could be used to deliver hydrogels with various therapeutic materials and mechanisms of action. Hydrogels are under investigation for various cardiac applications but few specialized delivery few methods have been designed2125. Intracoronary administration of hydrogels could lead to thrombosis or myocardial infarction. Intramyocardial injection by left ventricular catheter such as Noga Myostar injection catheter could also cause embolic events. Intra-myocardial injection at the time of cardiac surgery would limit eligible patients.

Here, we explore the efficacy of an amiodarone-containing hydrogel delivered to the epicardium of the cardiac atria in a large animal model of AF. Amiodarone delivered in this way could have multiple advantages over systemic dosing, the most important of which are localized drug delivery to the affected cardiac muscle and lessened off-target organ toxicity. This technology represents a new strategy for the treatment of AF, utilizing an existing effective medication that was formally limited by off-target organ toxicity. More broadly, this strategy could facilitate delivery of new cardiac therapeutics to the heart including stem cells, microRNAs, viral based therapies, exosomes and protein in a precise and effective manner.

Materials and Methods

Details of the data, analytic methods, and study materials not provided in this text will be been made available to other researchers upon request for purposes of reproducing the results or replicating the procedure.

Gel synthesis and in vitro analysis

Poly(ethylene glycol) [PEG] hydrogels based on a 4-arm PEG macromer (20 kDa, Laysan Bio, Arab, AL) with maleimides at each terminus (PEG-4MAL) were cross-linked with dithiothreitol and the bi-cysteine peptide VPM (GCRDVPMSMRGGDRCG). This platform provides structurally defined hydrogels with stoichiometric incorporation of ligands that has been extensively studied for biological applications20, 23, 26, 27. Hydrogel components were adjusted to yield a 5 mL gel of a 4.0% w/v PEG hydrogel containing 50 mg of polysorbate-solubilized amiodarone.

For the release study, amiodarone hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) was loaded into 20 µL hydrogels following solubilization in polysorbate 80. For solubilization, polysorbate 80 solutions (ratios of polysorbate 80:saline 5:95, 10:90, 20:80 and 30:70 v/v) were added to amiodarone to a final concentration of 50 mg/mL. This solution was then heated to 60° C and vortexed vigorously for 1 minute. This amiodarone solution was then added to the hydrogel components and the hydrogel cross-linked with dithiothreitol and VPM (1:1). After gelation, hydrogels were incubated in 500 µL of 10% human serum in PBS. At specified time points, all 500 µL was removed and replaced with fresh 500 µL of 10% human serum in PBS. Supernatants were frozen at −80° C and stored until analysis by high purity liquid chromatography (HPLC) as has been described previously28. Samples were separated on a Kinetex 5µm C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm). The mobile phase, consisting of phosphate buffer (50 mM) with 0.5% formic acid (pH 4.5)-methanol-acetonitrile (45:5:50, v/v/v), was pumped isocratically at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The detection was conducted at 254 nm.

Pericardial hydrogel delivery in rats

A rodent model of pericardial drug delivery was used to study amiodarone accumulation to target and off-target tissues. All rodent studies were approved by the Emory University Animal Use and Care Committee and performed in accordance with NIH guidelines. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g, Charles River, Wilmington, MA) were anesthetized with isoflurane and intubated. A thoracotomy was performed from the anterior approach, exposing the left lung and heart. The lung was gently retracted with sterile gauze and the pericardium grasped with burr-free atraumatic forceps. A blunted 26 G, 0.5 inch needle with # 5 style blunt tip was attached to a 100 µL syringe (Hamilton Company, Reno, NV) and was used to gently penetrate the tended pericardium. A 100 µL hydrogel containing 1 mg amiodarone (n = 6) was delivered into the pericardial space and gelation confirmed by visualization of gel surrounding the heart confined by the pericardial sac. After 1 month, animals were sacrificed and heart, lung, thyroid, liver, fat and gel remnants collected for tissue amiodarone measurements by HPLC. Additional rats (n=6) were treated with systemic amiodarone via daily intraperitoneal injection (10 mg/kg) for 28 days resulting in a cumulative dose of approximately 100 mg over 1 month depending on animal size and growth rate29.

Large animal atrial fibrillation model

The objective of this study was to create a large animal AF model that did not disrupt the pericardial space30. All pigs received antibiotics (cephalexin 5 mg/kg IM daily) to prevent hardware infection for the duration of the experiment and colchicine (0.6 mg PO BID) to prevent pericardial inflammation. Male farm pigs of 50–55 kg were used to simulate heart and pericardial size to adult humans. Seven days before gel implantation, animals were sedated and the right neck and internal jugular vein exposed. A chronic resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) was implanted (Viva, Medtronic, Minneapolis MN). The CRT-P is designed to clinically deliver 3 leads of output for the purpose of optimizing atrial and ventricular synchrony in heart failure31. Unlike the clinical configuration with one lead in the atrial, we positioned all 3 leads (CapSureFix, Medtronic) in the right atria with one in the right atrial appendage, high free wall, and low free wall. Tined, bipolar permanent pacing leads were introduced, advanced under fluoroscopic guidance. Each position was tested for capture threshold less than 2 V and sensing electrogram greater than 2 mV. Lack of diaphragmatic stimulation at maximal output was also confirmed. Leads were connected to the CRT-P and programed to rapidly pace at a rapid intervals in DOO mode (150 beats per minute pacing, with 140 msec atrio-ventricular delay then 80 msec right to left ventricular lead delay) using clinical programmer parameters. Maximal output, 8V, was used. The left neck and jugular vein were also used to implant a single chamber pacemaker (Advisa, Medtronic) with lead terminating in the right ventricular apex and set in VOO mode a rate of 100. Lastly, animals underwent His bundle ablation after receiving bolus of lidocaine (75 mg IV). A Blazer II (Boston Scientific) radiofrequency ablation catheter was advanced from the femoral vein to the AV node and positioned to optimize the His Bundle signal on intra-cardiac electrogram. Sixty (60) watts of power at 60 C for up to 30 seconds was used for each ablation. Pigs required between 1–4 ablations to achieve heart block. Ventricular arrhythmias generated by ablation were immediately cardioverted with external defibrillation.

Hydrogel implantation was performed 7 days after pacemaker implantation. Animals were placed recumbent on cardiac catheterization suite table (Allura FDA 10: Xper, Philips), and subxiphoid sterilely prepped and draped. A micropuncture needle was used to access the pericardial space under fluoroscopic guidance as has been described and used with other pericardial devices32. Our hydrogel delivery device was placed over the atrial epicardium (posterior, inferior) using a posterior directed sheath. The delivery device was advanced outside of the sheath and formed a temporary compartment for hydrogel delivery as has been recently described20. Negative pressure suction held the device in a stable position on the beating epicardium as well as temporarily sealed the hydrogel compartment. Hydrogel components were kept separated in 2 lumens and delivered to the atrial epicardium. The delivery device and suction was held in place for 5 minutes to allow for gelation. The suction was slowly released and device unwound from around the gel without disruption of gel architecture. During gel delivery procedure, animals were invasively monitored for hemodynamic changes with a Swan-Ganz catheter and arterial pressure line.

Electrophysiologic testing

At weekly intervals, animals were sedated and electrophysiologic study (EPS) performed using the CRT-P. After cessation of overdrive atrial pacing, atrial rhythm was monitor for 30 minutes via intra-cardiac electrograms and 12 lead EKG. The timing of spontaneous cardioversion into NSR was recorded. If animals did not cardiovert spontaneously, NSR was achieved by synchronized external defibrillation at 180 J to allow for subsequent testing. At least 5 minutes elapsed before further testing to allow for normalization of electrophysiologic conduction. Inducibility of AF was tested by performing atrial pacing at 50 Hz for 10 seconds using the CRT-P right atrial appendage lead. Ten trials were performed for each animal at each time point and number of inductions of AF lasting longer than 1 minute were recorded weekly.

Tissue processing and amiodarone quantification

Fresh or frozen tissue was diced into 5 mm2 sections and further homogenized using automated TissueLyzer (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). Amiodarone was extracted using acetonitrile, n-hexane, and methanol and analyzed by HPLC as was done for in vitro experiments28. Tissue for histologic evaluation was fixed in formalin, dehydrated using a graded series of ethyl alcohols and xylene, paraffin embedded, and stained with Masson’s Trichrome. Five µm thick sections were imaged using automated slide scanner and representative 10×magnification sections (Nanozoom, Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ). Histologic sections were evaluated by board certified pathologist blinded to the treatment groups. Colormetric segmentation was performed using ImageJ using the threshold function to maximize detection with lower limit of 120 and upper limit set to 190. Measurement of thresholded area was calculated as a percent of the total area of each 10× image. For each animal, three distinct areas of the left atrial were measured and averaged. Blood was collected from peripheral vein for serum markers performed using VetScan chemistry analyzer (Abaxis, Union City, CA) and white blood cell counts using automated hemocytometer.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc) as indicated in the test. Differences between group means were compared using unpaired Student’s t test with correction for repeated measures by the Holm-Sidak method where appropriate. Multiple groups were compared using ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

Results

Amiodarone encapsulation in a synthetic hydrogel achieves extended drug release in vitro

Amiodarone was encapsulated in a poly(ethylene glycol) [PEG]-based hydrogel, a gel platform that has shown significant advantages such as cytocompatability and controlled polymerization, tunable biophysical and biochemical properties, and minimal inflammation and toxicity23, 26, 27. Gel components were also selected due to their use in other clinically approved drugs and devices. The hydrogel was synthesized using a 4-arm PEG-maleimide macromer (Laysan Bio, Arab, AL) cross-linked via the terminal maleimides and dithiol-presenting molecules. Amiodarone was solubilized in different concentrations of polysorbate 80 prior to loading into the gel. Gels were kept under simulated physiologic temperature and motion. Release kinetics showed an initial release bolus of under 20% for amiodarone solubilized with either 5 or 10% polysorbate 80 and 30% and 52% release for amiodarone solubilized with 20 and 30% polysorbate 80, respectively (Fig. 1). Forty-eight hours after encapsulation, gels having amiodarone solubilized in 5% or 10% polysorbate 80 retained more than 40% of the initial dose. All subsequent experiments were conducted using amiodarone (50 mg/ml) solubilized in 10% polysorbate 80 and encapsulated in PEG hydrogel.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Amiodarone encapsulation extends drug release. Hydrogels were synthesized with amiodarone solubilized at differing concentrations of polysorbate 80 in saline after which amiodarone release was analyzed over time via HPLC. After 3 days in simulated in vivo conditions (37 C, 1 Hz shaking), hydrogels containing amiodarone solubilized with 5% or 10% polysorbate 80 retained more than 30% of total loaded amiodarone while hydrogels containing amiodarone solubilized with 20% or 30% polysorbate exhibited almost complete amiodarone release. N=2–3, error bars ± SEM.

Epicardial delivery of amiodarone-containing gel reduces off target drug accumulation

To test amiodarone tissue distribution, a 100 µL gel containing 1 mg of amiodarone was delivered into the pericardial space of rats via thoracotomy and compared to animals receiving daily systemic (intraperitoneal) amiodarone at a clinically equivalent dose (10 mg/kg/day). After 28 days, animals treated with systemic amiodarone (Fig. 2A, black bars) had higher accumulation of drug in off-target organs compared to epicardial amiodarone-containing gel-treated animals including the fat (36.1±10.7 v. 1.3±0.2 µg/g; P=0.02), lung (7.1±1.4 v. 0.9±0.1 µg/g; P=0.001), thyroid (86.7±20.8 v. 1.9±0.3 µg/g; P=0.002), and liver (2.8±0.9 v. 0.7±0.1 µg/g; P=0.03). Drug levels in the thyroid, lung, and liver were 45 times, 8 times, and 3 times higher, respectively, in systemically dosed animals compared to gel dosed animals.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Epicardial delivery of amiodarone-containing gel reduces off target drug accumulation. Rats were treated with systemic amiodarone by daily intraperitoneal (IP) injection (10mg/kg/day, n=6) or with a single epicardial amiodarone gel implant (1 mg/50 µl gel, n=6). After 28 days, animals treated with systemic amiodarone had higher drug accumulation in off target organs compared to gel treated controls in fat (36.1±10.7 v. 1.3±0.2 µg/g, P=0.02), lung (7.1±1.4 v. 0.9±0.1 µg/g, P=0.001), thyroid (86.7±20.8 v. 1.9±0.3 µg/g, P=0.002), and liver (2.8±0.9 v. 0.7±0.1 µg/g, P=0.03, A). In contrast, animals treated with amiodarone-containing gel had minimal off target drug accumulation (A, red bars). Significant drug was still present in recovered portions of gel (15.0±8.8 µg/g, A). While overall cardiac drug levels were low in both groups, levels in IP treated animals were higher at 28 days (2.7± 0.4 v. 1.1± 0.1 µg/g; P=0.004). N=6, * indicates p<0.05 comparing indicated groups using Student’s T test; error bars +/− SEM.

Cardiac amiodarone levels were low in both groups but higher in systemically dosed rats compared to gel-treated rats at day 7 (5.4±5.1 v. 0.2±0.03 µg/g; P=0.04) and day 28 (2.7± 0.4 v. 1.1± 0.1 µg/g; P=0.004, Fig. 2B). However, a higher proportion of the total administered dose was present in the heart of gel treated animals after 28 days (0.09±0.001 v. 0.001±0.0003%, P<0.001). Cardiac drug levels in amiodarone gel-treated animals increased from day 7 to 28 suggesting continual drug release over time (0.2±0.03 v. 1.1±0.3 µg/g; P=0.01; Fig. 2B, black bars). Recovered portions of the amiodarone-containing gel contained drug 7 and 28 days after implant (43.2±33.4 v. 15.0±8.8 µg/g; NS; Fig. 2A), decreasing as drug was dispersed from the gel.

Hydrogel was delivered to the atrial epicardium using a minimally invasive procedure

Using a micro-puncture needle to access the pericardial space percutaneously, a hydrogel delivery device was positioned over the atrial epicardium in all 9 animals (Fig. 3). Gel was delivered to the desired location with procedure times from skin puncture to sheath removal lasting 26.1±10.8 minutes (n=9). Four (4) animals were treated with a 5 mL hydrogel containing amiodarone (50 mg) and 4 with control gel of the same size containing no drug. One additional animal was excluded prior to gel implantation due to infection not related to gel. This amiodarone dose was the maximal quantity that could be incorporated into the gel without significant precipitation. Invasive hemodynamic parameters measured during the implantation procedure did not change acutely, or after 4 weeks (Table 1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Pericardial gel delivery is minimally invasive and completed using standard fluoroscopy equipment. The pericardial space was accessed by micro-puncture needle from a sub-xiphoid approach using fluoroscopy (A, arrow) with contrast injection and layering along the pericardium (A, arrowheads). Pericardial position was confirmed by wire confinement to cardiac silhouette (B, arrow). The delivery device (C, D arrow) was positioned over the left atrium using fluoroscopy in anterior-posterior (C) and lateral (D) views. Pacemaker leads (*) and Swan-Ganz catheter are visible in some views.

Table 1.

Invasive hemodynamics prior to and after epicardial gel delivery. Pigs underwent implantation of amiodarone-containing gel (Amio, n=4) or control gel (Cntrl, n=4) and intra-cardiac pressures monitored by Swan-Ganz catheter and ventricular pigtail catheter. There was no statistical difference between baseline or 4 week pressures over time or between groups in multiple cardiac chambers. Listed P values indicate variation between groups at 4 weeks by Student’s T-test with Holm-Sidak method of correction for repeated measures.

Hemodynamics (mmHg) Baseline 4 weeks Δ baseline p
Right atrium Cntrl 4.8±3.6 5.5±1.9 0.8 0.4
Amio 5.5±1.7 7.3±4.0 1.8

Right ventricle, diastole Cntrl 2.5±2.9 4.8±1.7 0.0 0.54
Amio 4.0±3.4 3.8±3.5 −0.3

Right ventricle, systole Cntrl 18.0±3.6 20.5±4.5 2.5 0.33
Amio 22.3±3.9 21.3±3.3 −1.0

Pulmonary capillary wedge Cntrl 7.5±1.9 6.5±3.1 −1.0 0.32
Amio 8.0±0.8 8.5±0.6 0.5

Left ventricle, diastole Cntrl 7.3±4.5 5.8±1.0 −1.5 0.65
Amio 6.8±1.7 6.5±2.1 −0.3

Left ventricle, systole Cntrl 61.8±6.2 63.5±4.7 1.8 0.66
Amio 65.6±4.7 64.5±6.7 −1.0

Atrial overdrive pacing using chronic resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) promotes AF

Overdrive pacing of the cardiac atria in pigs is an established large animal model of AF30, 33. Instead of utilizing a neurostimulator generator to achieve cycle lengths of 10 Hz at a single location in the atria, we implanted three leads attached to a CRT-P in the right atria to more closely model the electrical disorganization of AF (Fig. 4). One animal was excluded due to development of pacemaker pocket wound dehiscence and infection 7 days after implantation of CRT-P. Three animals had a pacemaker lead dislodgement detected by CRT-P interrogation and underwent successful lead revision the week before gel placement. One week after atrial overdrive pacing, control animals sustained AF for 0.75±1.5 min after temporary cessation of overdrive pacing (Fig. 5A). After 14 days, AF was sustained for 9.75 ± 13.5 min which is similar in scope to AF achieved by neurostimulator pacing in published studies30.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Atrial overdrive pacing using a 3 lead asynchronous strategy produced atrial fibrillation (AF) in swine. AF was induced by placement of 3 chronic resynchronization pacemaker (CRT-P) leads into the cardiac right atrium (A). Asynchronous and rapid pacing algorithm with intervals ranging from 80 – 170 milliseconds delivered similar frequency of stimulation compared to neurostimulator-induced overdrive pacing but provided longer battery life and allowed for non-invasive electrophysiologic testing (B). Schematic of experimental timeline (C) with AF induction 1 week before gel implant and iterative electrophysiologic studies (EPS).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Amiodarone containing gel reduces atrial fibrillation (AF) in a large animal model. Pigs were instrumented with chronic resynchronization therapy-pacemaker (CRT-P) in the right neck and all three leads were secured to the right atrium via the right internal jugular vein. Normal sinus rhythm (regular rate, consistent electrical morphology) or AF (irregular rate, variable morphology) was easily distinguishable on intra-cardiac recordings from CRT-P during temporary cessation of pacing (A). The pacing algorithm delivered rapid, sustained, and uncoordinated stimuli to the atria throughout the duration of the experiment mimicking persistent AF. The duration of sustained AF was reduced in animals treated with amiodarone-containing gel at 21 (19.5±13.1 v. 1.3±1.5 minutes, P=0.002) and 28 (22.5±13.0 v. 5.8±7.2 minutes, P=0.004, B). Similarly, the number of inducible AF episodes in response to 50 Hz pacing was lower in the amiodarone gel treated animals at 14 days (8.0±4.0 v. 2.5±4.4 attempts, P=0.039) and 21 days (9.7±0.6 v. 2.5±3.1 attempts, P=0.013, C) after gel delivery. N=4 per group; * p<0.05 using Student’s T test with Holm-Sidak method of correction for repeated measures; error bars +/− SEM.

Epicardial amiodarone-containing gel reduces atrial fibrillation

Nine pigs underwent implantation of the CRT-P device in the right neck and 3 pacing leads (Medtronic) implanted in the right atrium via the internal jugular vein. In all animals leads were distributed in the right atria in 3 distinct locations: right atrial appendage, upper lateral wall, and lower lateral wall. This configuration achieved sensing and pacing threshold goals but avoided diaphragmatic stimulation. Six of 9 animals required external defibrillation during His ablation from ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, and all were successfully cardioverted.

At weekly intervals, animals underwent EPS. After 2 weeks of overdrive pacing, animals in the control group sustained AF and by 3 weeks, tended to remain in AF for the full 30 minutes after cessation of overdrive pacing. In contrast, animals treated with amiodarone-containing hydrogel spontaneously cardioverted into NSR during the monitoring period and not a single animal maintained AF for the 30 minutes in the treatment group (Fig. 5B). At days 21 (19.5±13.1 v. 1.3±1.5 minutes; N=4; P=0.004) and day 28 (22.5±15.0 v. 5.8±8.3 minutes; N=4, P=0.004) amiodarone containing gel-treated animals had shorter duration of sustained AF (Fig. 5B). While awake, animals have higher heart rates and levels of adrenergic stimulation that could influence their propensity for AF. We confirmed that amiodarone-containing hydrogel significantly reduced the duration of sustained AF in awake animals at 19 (23.3±13.5 v. 0.75±1.5 minutes; N=4; p<0.05) and 26 days (25.5±9.0 v. 2.3±2.9 minutes; N=4; p<0.05) after hydrogel delivery. Statistical significance was calculated using Student’s T test corrected for multiple comparisons using the Holm-Sidak method (α=5.000%).

The inducibility of AF was also investigated using 10 second 50 Hz burst stimulation, a maneuver known to trigger AF. Animals treated with amiodarone-containing gel had fewer AF inductions in response to 50 Hz stimulation 14 days (8.0±4.0 v. 2.5±4.4 attempts, P=0.039) and 21 (9.7±0.6 v. 2.5±3.1 attempts, P=0.013) days after gel delivery (Fig. 5C). At 28 days, the positive inductions were lower in amiodarone hydrogel-treated animals, but failed to meet statistical significance (7.5±1.9 v. 3.5±4.1; n=4, NS) due to lack of inducibility in 1 control animal at this time point. Cardiac amiodarone levels in pigs were highest in the left atrium (0.11±0.05 µg/g) and pericardial fat (0.14±0.08 µg/g). Taken together, these results show that a one-time treatment with amiodarone-containing hydrogel is capable of reducing the duration of sustained AF as well as the propensity for induction of AF for at least 1 month in a large animal model of chronic overdrive atrial pacing.

Amiodarone-containing gel was non-toxic to the heart, liver, and lungs

Atrial fibrosis has been linked to progression of AF in patients and animal models33, 34. Treatments that reduce AF including amiodarone have been reported to reduce atrial fibrosis in animal models33. Inflammation, if triggered by gel could also cause atrial fibrosis. Tissue sections from the left atria were fixed and stained with Masson’s Trichrome and fibrosis measured by non-biased colormetric analysis with Image J. There was no difference between control hearts from animals without any cardiac manipulation (normal sinus rhythm) and AF animals. Furthermore, amiodarone content of gel did not increase detectable fibrosis (24.1±6.6 v. 26.2±7.3%; N=4; NS, Fig. 6A) using Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Epicardial administration of amiodarone-containing gel had no cardiac or liver toxicity. Left atrial appendage sections were fixed in formalin and stained with Masson’s Trichrome showing varying degrees of fibrosis (A). Amiodarone-containing gel treated animals showed similar percentage fibrosis on colormetric analysis compared to control animals in sinus rhythm as well as AF animals treated with control gel (A). Liver function studies did not vary over time or between groups at weekly time points (B).

To rule out the possibility of pulmonary toxicity in animals treated with amiodarone-containing gel, tissue sections from the posterior basal inferior lobe of the lung were collected, and evaluated by 2 board certified pathologist blinded to treatment condition. This location was chosen due to its close anatomic position to the location of gel delivery. In all 4 control gel treated animals and 2 amiodarone containing gel animals, mild focal inflammation was reported including patchy bronchiolitis and mild interstitial pneumonitis-like inflammation. Overall no significant lung inflammatory findings were preset in either group. Serum markers of liver function (albumin, alkaline phosphatase (Alk phos), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and bilirubin showed no significant change over the course of the experiment (Fig. 6B, Table 2). Creatinine as a marker of kidney function was higher at baseline in the amiodarone-containing gel treated group but remained stable over the course of the experiment (Table 2).

Table 2.

Serum markers of liver and kidney function studies and white blood cell (WBC) counts. Pigs were treated with control gel containing no amiodarone (Cntrl, n=4)) or amiodarone containing gel (Amio, n=4). Prior to gel implantation procedure and 4 weeks later, serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase (Alk phos), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and bilirubin were measured as markers of liver function and did not differ between groups. Serum creatinine was measured as a marker of kidney function and was higher in amiodarone-containing gel treated animals compared to control (2.0±0.3 v. 1.1±0.1 mg/dL, P=0.03) although levels were elevated at baseline before gel delivery and remained stable in the amiodarone group. WBC count and differential were similar between groups.

Liver function studies Baseline 4 weeks Δ baseline p

Albumin (g/dL) Cntrl 3.4±0.7 3.8±0.2 0.6 0.07
Amio 3.5±0.3 3.2±0.3 −0.3
Alkphos (U/L) Cntrl 77.0±32.9 92.5±58.0 15.5 0.29
Amio 122.8±48.0 136.0±41.0 13.3
Alt (U/L) Cntrl 49.3±19.3 49.5±8.3 0.5 0.64
Amio 55.0±10.0 55.0±15.3 0.0
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) Cntrl 0.3±0.1 0.3±0.1 0.0 0.99
Amio 0.3±0.1 0.2±0.0 −0.1
Other laboratory tests Baseline 4 weeks Δ baseline p

Creatinine (mg/dL) Cntrl 1.1±0.1 1.8±0.4 0.7 0.03
Amio 2.0±0.3 1.9±0.2 0.3
WBC (×10^9/L) Cntrl 14.6±3.9 12.2±3.2 −2.4 0.62
Amio 13.1±4.4 10.4±2.6 −2.7

Discussion

Here, we describe a new and effective strategy to treat AF by delivering hydrogel-encapsulated amiodarone directly to the heart through the pericardial space. Pigs treated with a single dose of amiodarone-containing hydrogel (50 mg amiodarone/5 mL gel) delivered to the atrial epicardium had reduced duration and inducibility of AF for at least 4 weeks compared to empty gel controls (Fig. 5). The gel was successfully delivered in a minimally invasive procedure. Using a rat model to study drug tissue distribution, systemically administrated amiodarone resulted in significant drug accumulation in off-target organs (Fig. 2A) consistent with other studies16, 17, 35. In contrast, epicardial gel-treated animals had significantly lower off-target organ drug accumulation, drastically so in the case of the fat, liver and thyroid. Recovered portions of epicardial amiodarone gel still contained drug at 7 and 28 days post-delivery (Fig. 2A). Continued drug availability in the gel is evidenced by increasing cardiac drug levels in this group from days 7 to 28. These data show proof of principle that epicardial hydrogels can 1) deliver therapeutics directly to the heart, 2) achieve continued release over several weeks, and 3) reduce off-target organ accumulation. Thus, epicardial hydrogel delivery may be a beneficial strategy for many cardiac targeted therapeutics.

Achieving rhythm control in persistent AF is challenging due to the confluence of pathophysiologic factors including fibrosis, electrical remodeling, and autonomic nervous system activation36. Amiodarone is effective in treating AF, although its use is limited by off-target organ toxicity8, 1518. The hydrophobicity of amiodarone delays attainment of therapeutic cardiac levels and contributes to buildup of drug in off-target tissues. For outpatient use, patients are often dosed with a 10 gram ‘load’ then treated with 200–800 mg of drug daily. In the present study, a single 50 mg dose of amiodarone delivered directly to the atrial epicardium sustained therapeutic effects over 4 weeks at 5% of the systemic loading dose (10 g), 25% of the daily dose (200 mg) and 0.3% of the cumulative monthly dose (17 g)37. The reduced dose lessens the chance for off-target organ toxicity.

Prior studies have examined the delivery of cardiovascular agents in the pericardial space and may have some advantages over systemic delivery, especially for newer classes of cardiac therapeutics. The space is in direct contact with the cardiac epicardium. The pericardium is also known to act as a barrier slowing systemic distribution of instilled therapeutics in animal trials3840. Vascular washout of the therapeutic is eliminated since pericardial fluid is only slowly replenished over several hours41. There is no risk of vascular occlusion or embolization since the pericardial space is not within the vasculature.

There are several challenges in utilizing the pericardial space. Few physicians have expertise at accessing a pericardial space lacking effusion – a so called ‘dry’ pericardium. With the advent of epicardial ablations for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, as well as the Lariat Device for suturing of the left atrial appendage, invasive cardiologists have gained skill in this technique. In one study, there were no reported complications from pericardial access when a micro-puncture kit was used32. Another limitation of the pericardial space is its propensity for inflammation. Our hydrogel has shown minimal inflammation and no local or systemic toxicity in numerous pre-clinical settings20, 23, 26, 27. Furthermore, utilizing a one-time intra-pericardial steroid dose in conjunction with the anti-inflammatory medication colchicine, we were able to eliminate clinically significant pericardial inflammation. Further studies will be needed to confirm the safety of this therapy over the long term.

In the current study, we do not know the maximum duration of action of amiodarone delivered in this manner. Gel recovered from rats after 28 days still contained amiodarone and tissue drug levels rose from 7 to 28 days suggesting continual tissue level rise. Longer studies will be needed to understand the duration of drug release and efficacy. For clinical translation, several months of efficacy would be ideal to avoid repeated pericardial procedures. Other formulations such as liposomes or micro particle encapsulation may give prolonged duration of release although will likely deliver a smaller amiodarone quantity per volume of gel. Along with the release profile, it is key to determine the inflammatory profile of any material delivered to the pericardial space.

Several studies have explored the possibility of anti-arrhythmic therapy delivered to the cardiac epicardium. Intra-pericardial injection of sotalol, ibutilide, and esmolol showed acute physiologic effects, but these drugs have not been tested in chronic studies or extended release gel formulations38, 42. Infusion of amiodarone acutely into the pericardial space has been shown to increase cardiac amiodarone levels and have electrophysiologic effects4345. Other groups have developed hydrogels for amiodarone delivery to the heart. These formulations deliver drug over days not months for the post-operative cardiac surgery population and require a spray or direct application4648. Combination patches with steroid formulation have also been studied in rodents49. These preparations require direct delivery to the heart and are not amenable to minimally invasive delivery in patients not undergoing open heart surgery.

A challenge for development of amiodarone-delivering gel is the lack of data on the effective cardiac amiodarone levels needed for suppression of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. With systemic dosing, plasma drug levels do not correlate well with cardiac drug levels17. Autopsy studies of patients receiving acute or chronic amiodarone therapy report cardiac drug levels ranging from 1–40 µg/g17, 35, 50. Drug levels achieved in rat and pig studies are lower than that achieved in these clinical settings, although efficacy was still shown in our animal model. This suggests that lower drug levels many be efficacious in some patients. However, this model may lack pathophysiologic factors that could influence the therapeutic threshold and may underestimate cardiac drug levels needed in sicker patient populations. Further studies will be needed to explore efficacious tissue amiodarone levels.

In conclusion, we show the possibility of utilization of the pericardial space for therapeutic hydrogel delivery. Using our minimally invasive delivery device, an amiodarone-containing hydrogel was placed on the atrial epicardium and showed efficacy for at least one month. Complementary small animal studies showed advantageous tissue amiodarone distribution that could result in reduced toxicity from lower off target tissue distribution. Further studies on the duration of action and long term safety are needed prior to translation of this biomaterial strategy into clinical use. However, this technique could be a more efficient mode of delivery for a variety of new therapeutics – such as stem cells, miRNAs, cytokines, gene therapy – that would benefit from more direct cardiac localization.

Supplementary Material

006408_graphic abstract

What is known?

  • Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia

  • Rhythm control may reduce morbidity and hospitalization, but is difficult to attain in many patients

  • Amiodarone is an effective rhythm control medication, but has significant systemic toxicity

What the study adds?

  • Amiodarone can be delivered directly to the heart encapsulated in hydrogel

  • With this method, 50mg of amiodarone reduces atrial fibrillation for one month

  • Minimally invasive epicardial delivery of hydrogels is a translatable method to deliver therapeutics to the heart

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding: This work was funded by the Coulter Translational Foundation and the Georgia Research Alliance.

Footnotes

Disclosures: PFC and RDL are inventors on patent application submitted by Emory University that covers delivery device technology. RDL is founder of CorAmi LLC which seeks to commercialize technology discussed in this paper, but provided no funds for this study. AJG is technical consultant to CorAmi. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Executive SummaryA Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2246–2280. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, de Ferranti S, Despres JP, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Liu S, Mackey RH, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER, 3rd, Moy CS, Muntner P, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Rodriguez CJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Willey JZ, Woo D, Yeh RW, Turner MB. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2015 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2015;131:e29–e322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amin AN, Jhaveri M, Lin J. Incremental cost burden to US healthcare payers of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter patients with additional risk factors. Adv Ther. 2011;28:907–26. doi: 10.1007/s12325-011-0065-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim MH, Johnston SS, Chu BC, Dalal MR, Schulman KL. Estimation of total incremental health care costs in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4:313–20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.958165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wijffels MCEF, Kirchhof CJHJ, Dorland R, Allessie MA. Atrial Fibrillation Begets Atrial Fibrillation: A Study in Awake Chronically Instrumented Goats. Circulation. 1995;92:1954–1968. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.7.1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ, Jr, Davies DW, DiMarco J, Edgerton J, Ellenbogen K, Ezekowitz MD, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Hindricks G, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jalife J, Jais P, Kalman J, Keane D, Kim YH, Kirchhof P, Klein G, Kottkamp H, Kumagai K, Lindsay BD, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Packer DL, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ, Tsao HM, Wilber D. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:632–696.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S, Wyse DG, Dorian P, Lee KL, Bourassa MG, Arnold JM, Buxton AE, Camm AJ, Connolly SJ, Dubuc M, Ducharme A, Guerra PG, Hohnloser SH, Lambert J, Le Heuzey JY, O'Hara G, Pedersen OD, Rouleau JL, Singh BN, Stevenson LW, Stevenson WG, Thibault B, Waldo AL. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2667–77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lafuente-Lafuente C, Valembois L, Bergmann JF, Belmin J. Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD005049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley SD. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1825–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hagens VE, Ranchor AV, Van Sonderen E, Bosker HA, Kamp O, Tijssen JG, Kingma JH, Crijns HJ, Van Gelder IC. Effect of rate or rhythm control on quality of life in persistent atrial fibrillation. Results from the Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:241–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Singh SN, Tang XC, Singh BN, Dorian P, Reda DJ, Harris CL, Fletcher RD, Sharma SC, Atwood JE, Jacobson AK, Lewis HD, Lopez B, Raisch DW, Ezekowitz MD. Quality of Life and Exercise Performance in Patients in Sinus Rhythm Versus Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:721–730. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Allen LaPointe NM, Lokhnygina Y, Rimmler J, Sanders GD, Peterson ED, Al-Khatib SM. Use Of Rate And Rhythm Control Drugs In Patients Younger Than 65 Years With Atrial Fibrillation. J Atr Fibrillation. 2014;7:22–30. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tilz RR, Rillig A, Thum AM, Arya A, Wohlmuth P, Metzner A, Mathew S, Yoshiga Y, Wissner E, Kuck KH, Ouyang F. Catheter ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: 5-year outcomes of the Hamburg Sequential Ablation Strategy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1921–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Desai AM, Cavanaugh TM, Desai VC, Heaton PC, Kelton CM. Trends in the outpatient treatment of atrial fibrillation in the USA from 2001 to 2010. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014;23:539–47. doi: 10.1002/pds.3605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shinagawa K, Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Schram G, Nattel S. Effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on fibrillation in the remodeled atrium: insights into the mechanism of the superior efficacy of amiodarone. Circulation. 2003;107:1440–6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000055316.35552.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Adams PC, Holt DW, Storey GC, Morley AR, Callaghan J, Campbell RW. Amiodarone and its desethyl metabolite: tissue distribution and morphologic changes during long-term therapy. Circulation. 1985;72:1064–75. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.72.5.1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Candinas R, Frielingsdorf J, Ha HR, Carrel T, Turina M, Follath F. Myocardial amiodarone concentrations after short- and long-term treatment in patients with end-stage heart failure. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;53:331–6. doi: 10.1007/s002280050388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Primeau R, Agha A, Giorgi C, Shenasa M, Nadeau R. Long term efficacy and toxicity of amiodarone in the treatment of refractory cardiac arrhythmias. Can J Cardiol. 1989;5:98–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Andrade JG, Macle L, Nattel S, Verma A, Cairns J. Contemporary Atrial Fibrillation Management: A Comparison of the Current AHA/ACC/HRS, CCS, and ESC Guidelines. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:965–976. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Garcia JR, Campbell PF, Kumar G, Langberg JJ, Cesar L, Wang L, García AJ, Levit RD. A Minimally Invasive, Translational Method to Deliver Hydrogels to the Heart Through the Pericardial Space. JACC: Basic to Translational Science. 2017;2:601. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mann DL, Lee RJ, Coats AJ, Neagoe G, Dragomir D, Pusineri E, Piredda M, Bettari L, Kirwan BA, Dowling R, Volterrani M, Solomon SD, Sabbah HN, Hinson A, Anker SD. One-year follow-up results from AUGMENT-HF: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial of the efficacy of left ventricular augmentation with Algisyl in the treatment of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:314–25. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Seif-Naraghi SB, Singelyn JM, Salvatore MA, Osborn KG, Wang JJ, Sampat U, Kwan OL, Strachan GM, Wong J, Schup-Magoffin PJ, Braden RL, Bartels K, DeQuach JA, Preul M, Kinsey AM, DeMaria AN, Dib N, Christman KL. Safety and efficacy of an injectable extracellular matrix hydrogel for treating myocardial infarction. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:173ra25. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Levit RD, Landazuri N, Phelps EA, Brown ME, Garcia AJ, Davis ME, Joseph G, Long R, Safley SA, Suever JD, Lyle AN, Weber CJ, Taylor WR. Cellular encapsulation enhances cardiac repair. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000367. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Menasche P, Vanneaux V, Hagege A, Bel A, Cholley B, Cacciapuoti I, Parouchev A, Benhamouda N, Tachdjian G, Tosca L, Trouvin JH, Fabreguettes JR, Bellamy V, Guillemain R, Suberbielle Boissel C, Tartour E, Desnos M, Larghero J. Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiac progenitors for severe heart failure treatment: first clinical case report. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2011–7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sonnenberg SB, Rane AA, Liu CJ, Rao N, Agmon G, Suarez S, Wang R, Munoz A, Bajaj V, Zhang S, Braden R, Schup-Magoffin PJ, Kwan OL, DeMaria AN, Cochran JR, Christman KL. Delivery of an engineered HGF fragment in an extracellular matrix-derived hydrogel prevents negative LV remodeling post-myocardial infarction. Biomaterials. 2015;45:56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Phelps EA, Templeman KL, Thule PM, Garcia AJ. Engineered VEGF-releasing PEG-MAL hydrogel for pancreatic islet vascularization. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2015;5:125–36. doi: 10.1007/s13346-013-0142-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Boopathy AV, Martinez MD, Smith AW, Brown ME, Garcia AJ, Davis ME. Intramyocardial Delivery of Notch Ligand-Containing Hydrogels Improves Cardiac Function and Angiogenesis Following Infarction. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21:2315–22. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rodrigues M, Alves G, Ferreira A, Queiroz J, Falcão A. A Rapid HPLC Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Amiodarone and its Major Metabolite in Rat Plasma and Tissues: A Useful Tool for Pharmacokinetic Studies. J Chromatogr Sci. 2013;51:361–370. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/bms149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Najjar TA. Disposition of amiodarone in rats after single and multiple intraperitoneal doses. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2001;26:65–9. doi: 10.1007/BF03190378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nishida K, Michael G, Dobrev D, Nattel S. Animal models for atrial fibrillation: clinical insights and scientific opportunities. 2010 doi: 10.1093/europace/eup328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Prinzen FW, Vernooy K, Auricchio A. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. State-of-the-Art of Current Applications, Guidelines, Ongoing Trials, and Areas of Controversy. 2013;128:2407–2418. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lakkireddy D, Afzal MR, Lee RJ, Nagaraj H, Tschopp D, Gidney B, Ellis C, Altman E, Lee B, Kar S, Bhadwar N, Sanchez M, Gadiyaram V, Evonich R, Rasekh A, Cheng J, Cuoco F, Chandhok S, Gunda S, Reddy M, Atkins D, Bommana S, Cuculich P, Gibson D, Nath J, Ferrell R, Matthew E. Short and long-term outcomes of percutaneous left atrial appendage suture ligation: Results from a US multicenter evaluation. Heart Rhythm. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ashikaga K, Kobayashi T, Kimura M, Owada S, Sasaki S, Iwasa A, Furukawa K, Motomura S, Okumura K. Effects of amiodarone on electrical and structural remodeling induced in a canine rapid pacing-induced persistent atrial fibrillation model. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;536:148–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bauer A, McDonald AD, Donahue JK. Pathophysiological findings in a model of persistent atrial fibrillation and severe congestive heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;61:764–770. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Barbieri E, Conti F, Zampieri P, Trevi GP, Zardini P, d'Aranno V, Latini R. Amiodarone and desethylamiodarone distribution in the atrium and adipose tissue of patients undergoing short- and long-term treatment with amiodarone. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8:210–3. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80114-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nattel S, Dobrev D. Electrophysiological and molecular mechanisms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:575–590. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.**Pfizer. Amiodarone hydrochloride injection-Prescribing information. 2017 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Moreno R, Waxman S, Rowe K, Verrier RL. Intrapericardial beta-adrenergic blockade with esmolol exerts a potent antitachycardic effect without depressing contractility. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000;36:722–7. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200012000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lew MJ, Ludbrook J, Pavia JM, Quail AW, Rutter PC. Selective manipulation of neurohumoral control of the cardiac pacemaker by drugs given intrapericardially. J Pharmacol Methods. 1987;17:137–48. doi: 10.1016/0160-5402(87)90024-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.van Brakel TJ, Hermans JJ, Janssen BJ, van Essen H, Botterhuis N, Smits JF, Maessen JG. Intrapericardial delivery enhances cardiac effects of sotalol and atenolol. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2004;44:50–6. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200407000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hermans JJ, van Essen H, Struijker-Boudier HA, Johnson RM, Theeuwes F, Smits JF. Pharmacokinetic advantage of intrapericardially applied substances in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;301:672–8. doi: 10.1124/jpet.301.2.672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vereckei A, Gorski JC, Ujhelyi M, Mehra R, Zipes DP. Intrapericardial ibutilide administration fails to terminate pacing-induced sustained atrial fibrillation in dogs. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2004;18:269–77. doi: 10.1023/B:CARD.0000041246.13952.b4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Marcano J, Campos K, Rodriguez V, Handy K, Brewer MA, Cohn WE. Intrapericardial delivery of amiodarone rapidly achieves therapeutic levels in the atrium. Heart Surg Forum. 2013;16:E279–86. doi: 10.1532/hsf98.2013188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ayers GM, Rho TH, Ben-David J, Besch HR, Jr, Zipes DP. Amiodarone instilled into the canine pericardial sac migrates transmurally to produce electrophysiologic effects and suppress atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7:713–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00579.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Darsinos JT, Karli JN, Samouilidou EC, Krumbholz B, Pistevos AC, Levis GM. Distribution of amiodarone in heart tissues following intrapericardial administration. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;37:301–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Beckerman Z, Azran A, Cohen O, Nir RR, Maessen JG, Bianco-Peled H, Bolotin G. A novel amiodarone-eluting biological glue for reducing postoperative atrial fibrillation: first animal trial. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2014;19:481–91. doi: 10.1177/1074248414527640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bolderman RW, Hermans JJ, Rademakers LM, de Jong MM, Bruin P, Dias AA, van der Veen FH, Maessen JG. Epicardial application of an amiodarone-releasing hydrogel to suppress atrial tachyarrhythmias. Int J Cardiol. 2011;149:341–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Feng XD, Wang XN, Yuan XH, Wang W. Effectiveness of biatrial epicardial application of amiodarone-releasing adhesive hydrogel to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:939–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Robinson E, Kaushal S, Alaboson J, Sharma S, Belagodu A, Watkins C, Walker B, Webster G, McCarthy P, Ho D. Combinatorial release of dexamethasone and amiodarone from a nano-structured parylene-C film to reduce perioperative inflammation and atrial fibrillation. Nanoscale. 2016;8:4267–4275. doi: 10.1039/c5nr07456h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Falik R, Flores BT, Shaw L, Gibson GA, Josephson ME, Marchlinski FE. Relationship of steady-state serum concentrations of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone to therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects. Am J Med. 1987;82:1102–8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90211-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

006408_graphic abstract

RESOURCES