Skip to main content
. 2018 May 14;13(5):e0197432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197432

Table 2. Baseline and post-intervention surveys in Mopani District to assess the impact of a health system strengthening support package to improve primary eye care.

Intervention Sites Control Sites
Baseline Post Baseline Post pa
Organisation of Care
nb 20 20 16 16
Staff member responsible for ophthalmic care 10.0% 40.0% 18.8% 12.5% 0.02
Designated ophthalmic consulting room 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.00
Sufficient space to perform VA 40.0% 55.0% 37.5% 43.8% 1.00
Ability to create a dark environment 65.0% 73.7% 62.5% 81.3% 0.48
Have guidelines for eye screening 20.0% 75.0% 31.3% 0.0% <0.01
Meetings with hospitals about eye care 0.0% 15.0% 18.8% 0.0% 0.04
Transport of referred patients with acute ophthalmic conditions 50.0% 70.0% 56.3% 0.0% <0.01
Transport of referred patients with chronic ophthalmic conditions 45.0% 40.0% 43.8% 0.0% 0.17
Returns from hospital with written feedback, median (range) 0.0% (0.0–1.0) 1.0% (0.0–100) 0.0% (0.0–20.0) 5.0% (0.0–20.0) 0.74
Eye teams visit the facility 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 62.5% 0.88
Essential Resources & Drugs
nb 20 20 16 16
Distance VA chart available 75.0% 100% 87.5% 56.3% <0.01
Correct distance from patient to VA chart 26.7% 72.2% 21.4% 33.3% 0.19
Pen torch available 0.0% 70.0% 18.8% 0.0% <0.01
Direct ophthalmoscope available 50.0% 47.4% 62.5% 12.5% 0.10
Essential drugs available, median (range)c 55.6% (22.2–66.7) 55.6% (22.2–77.8) 55.6% (22.2–77.8) 55.6% (33.3–88.9) 0.47
Stock-outs of essential drugs in previous 3 months 55.0% 33.3% 43.8% 53.3% 0.21
Clinical Practice
nb 57 60 45 48
Saw an ophthalmic patient <6 months ago 100% 93.1% 95.6% 97.9% 0.08
Estimated ophthalmic patients seen per month, median (range) 12.0 (3.0–50.0) 10.0 (0.0–80.0) 15.0 (2.0–99.0) 15.0 (2.0–80.0) 0.16
Enjoy serving ophthalmic patientsd 49.1% 50.8% 48.9% 25.5% 0.08
Comfortable managing ophthalmic patientsd 36.8% 43.1% 31.1% 25.0% 0.28
Consider ophthalmic knowledge adequated 7.0% 18.6% 4.4% 12.5% 0.53
Know how to perform VAd 33.3% 63.3% 37.8% 14.6% <0.01
Know how to assess the pupillary light reflexd 7.0% 36.7% 17.8% 14.6% <0.01
Know how to use an ophthalmoscoped 5.3% 18.3% 17.8% 8.3% 0.02
Know how to administer topical eye drugsd 33.3% 57.9% 40.0% 37.5% 0.03
Aware of referral criteria for ophthalmic patients 59.6% 88.1% 57.8% 72.9% 0.33
Knowledge of referral criteria: objectively evaluatede 56.1% 80.0% 55.6% 33.3% <0.01
Clinical knowledge: objectively evaluatedf 14.0% 16.7% 11.1% 8.3% 0.76

All variables are self-reported unless otherwise indicated. VA, visual acuity.

a p for change in intervention sites versus change in control sites. Statistically significant differences are shown in bold.

b Assessments evaluating Organisation of Care and Essential Resources & Drugs were administered at facility level (n = facilities); Questionnaires evaluating Clinical Practice were administered at an individual level (n = individuals) and then aggregated to facility level for analysis.

c Percentage of the following nine drugs that were available in each facility: topical anaesthetics, sodium chloride, oral pain killers, topical anti-allergic drops, oral anti-allergic medication, topical antibiotics, oral or intra-muscular antibiotics, oral anti-glaucoma drugs and topical miotics.

d Self-reported using a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = not at all, 3 = fine and 5 = very much. Percentage represents the number of ratings of 4 or 5 out of the total number of ratings.

e Percentage who answered 2 or more questions regarding referral criteria correctly out of 3.

f Percentage who answered 6 or more clinical questions correctly out of 11, namely scored >50%.