Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 1;79(3):282–288. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607288

Table 4. Distribution of lymphatic levels affected in patients with known regional metastases.

Category a Ipsilateral Contralateral
I–IV V RP PAR Any
Histologic type
 Low risk 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b
 Moderate risk 78.6 17.9 14.3 14.3 17.9 b
 High risk 89.7 13.8 10.3 13.8 55.2 b
Location of primary
 Midline 94.7 10.5 10.5 b 10.5 47.4
 Ethmoid complex 81.8 0.0 18.2 b 27.3 27.3
 Maxillary complex 80.0 15.0 0.0 b 10.0 20.0
 Frontal/sphenoid 66.7 33.3 0.0 b 0.0 66.7
 Other nasal cavity 83.3 50.0 50.0 b 16.7 50.0
Invasion c
 Skull base Yes 90.0 16.7 20.0 13.3 53.3 b
No 79.3 13.8 3.4 13.8 17.2 b
 Dura Yes 90.9 13.6 18.2 13.6 54.5 b
No 81.1 16.2 8.1 13.5 24.3 b
 Pterygoid space Yes 100.0 42.9 42.9 b 14.3 42.9
No 82.7 11.5 7.7 b 13.5 34.6
 Facial soft tissue Yes 33.3 b 16.7 0.0 50.0 b 16.7
No 90.6 b 15.1 13.2 9.4 b 37.7

Abbreviations: I–IV, levels I to IV of the lateral neck; V, level V of the lateral neck; Any, any contralateral nodes; PAR, parotid; RP, retropharynx.

Note : Within a certain category, the values in this table represent how often (%) a regional basin was affected in patients who had known regional metastases. Rows do not sum to 100% due to patients having metastases in multiple lymphatic basins.

a

Categories also included in statistical analysis but not reported in this table due to nonsignificant findings: histologic grade of tumor and T-stage.

b

p  < 0.05 by Fisher's exact test.

c

Statistical testing for the invasion category is a comparison between those with and without invasion into the applicable structure. Testing was also completed for invasion of the orbit, brain, infratemporal fossa, pterygopalatine fossa, nasopharynx, and palate, and no significant differences were identified.