Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Plast Surg Nurs. 2017 Oct-Dec;37(4):146–153. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000205

Table 3.

Number and Percentage of Women who Reported that Reconstruction was Worse than Expected and Reasons by Reconstruction Method

Reason category Total
(n = 55)
Implant
(n = 39)
Autologous
(n = 7)
Appearance/feel 28 (50%) 21 (53.8%) 2 (28.6%)
Pain/lack of 14 (25%) 7 (17.9%) 1 (14.3%)
Discomfort/lack of 11 (19.6%) 11 (28.2%)
Healing/recovery time 11 (19.6%) 6 (15.4%) 3 (42.9%)
Technical 10 (17.9%) 4 (10.3%) 3 (42.9%)
Emotional well-being

Column n’s do not sum to the column headings because women could provide multiple reasons for why reconstruction did not meet their expectations. Nine of the 55 women who rated reconstruction as worse than expected did not have a confirmed reconstruction method in the dataset. These women were included in the “Total” column.