Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Plast Surg Nurs. 2017 Oct-Dec;37(4):146–153. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000205

Table 4.

Number and Percentage of Women who Reported that Reconstruction was Better than Expected and Reasons by Reconstruction Method

Reason category Total
(n=33)
Implant
(n = 19)
Autologous Tissue (n = 5 women)
Appearance/feel 27 (80%) 11 (57.9%) 5 (100%)
Pain/lack of 2 (5.7%) - -
Discomfort/lack of 1 (2.9%) - -
Healing/recovery time 3 (8.6%) 2 (10.5%) -
Technical 2 (5.7%) 1 (5.3%) -
Emotional well-being 4 (11.4%) 1 (5.3%) -

Column n’s do not sum to the column headings because women could provide multiple reasons for why reconstruction did not meet their expectations. Nine of the 33 women who rated reconstruction as better than expected did not have a confirmed reconstruction method in the dataset. These 9 women were included in the “Total” column.