Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2018 Apr-Jun;32(2):150–155. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000224

Table 2.

SNQ22 total and error scores by demographics and Clinical Dementia Rating

Characteristics n Total SNQ22: Mean (SD) p-value* Over-adherence errors: Mean (SD) p-value* Break–norms errors: Mean (SD) p-value*
Age at Wave 9. 65–74 45 20.38 (1.64) <0.0001 ** 1.07 (1.32) <0.0001** 0.56 (0.78) 0.4293
75–84 342 20.90 (1.70) 1.22 (1.33) 0.59 (1.02)
85+ 358 19.56 (1.98) 1.79 (1.68) 0.65 (0.98)
Gender Male 259 19.41 (1.92) <0.0001 1.78 (1.53) 0.0001 0.81 (1.13) 0.0001
Female 486 20.17 (1.78) 1.32 (1.51) 0.51 (0.89)
Race White 709 19.94 (1.84) 0.0443 1.46 (1.51) 0.0943 0.61 (0.98) 0.3609
Other 36 19.21 (2.13) 2.00 (1.91) 0.79 (1.17)
Education < HS 74 19.60 (2.19) 0.4950 1.74 (1.79) 0.5467 0.66 (0.99) 0.9145
= HS 307 19.91 (1.80) 1.50 (1.54) 0.59 (0.94)
> HS 364 19.96 (1.86) 1.42 (1.47) 0.63 (1.03)
CDR 0 544 20.13 (1.66) <0.0001** 1.29 (1.37) <0.0001** 0.58 (0.94) 0.5589
0.5 171 19.39 (2.15) 1.90 (1.72) 0.71 (1.12)
≥ 1 30 18.33 (2.44) 2.96 (2.23) 0.71 (1.04)
*

p-values based on non-parametric tests; Wilcoxon rank-sum or Kruskal-Wallis as appropriate.

**

post-hoc pairwise comparisons using Dunn’s test with Bonferroni-adjusted p-value of 0.0167 were significant (i) for Total SNQ22: age 75–84 vs. age 85+; CDR=0 vs. CDR =0.5, and CDR =0 vs. CDR >=1;

(ii) for Over-adherence subscale: age 65–74 vs. age 85+ and age 75–84 vs. 85+; CDR=0 vs. CDR=0.5 and CDR=0 vs. CDR >=1.