Skip to main content
. 2018 May 14;8:7521. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25298-8

Table 1.

Characteristics for the sample of 626 participants (Sample A) that underwent three tests, the subset of 200 participants who performed ten tests (Sample B) and up to 253 participants who were tested with five visual illusions (Samples C; n = 173 to 253).

Samples Female subjects Male subjects p
Sample A (n = 626) 342 284
Age (mean ± sd) 32.19 ± 15.16 33.09 ± 16.03 p = 0.48
Age range 18–75 18–82
Sample B (n = 200) 113 87
Age (mean ± sd) 43.67 ± 23.5 46 ± 25.98 p = 0.51
Age range 18–86 18–90
Samples C
  Ebbinghaus (n = 209) 93 116
  Age (mean ± sd) 35.37 ± 17.01 33.00 ± 15.25 p = 0.29
  Age range 18–73 18–80
  Müller-Lyer (n = 253) 115 138
  Age (mean ± sd) 36.02 ± 16.01 33.47 ± 14.19 p = 0.19
  Age range 18–73 18–80
  Ponzo (n = 173) 76 97
  Age (mean ± sd) 28.92 ± 10.18 28.95 ± 9.49 p = 0.99
  Age range 18–55 18–54
  Ponzo-Hallway (n = 194) 84 110
  Age (mean ± sd) 36.67 ± 17.44 32.72 ± 14.82 p = 0.10
  Age range 18–73 18–80
  Tilt (n = 200) 93 107
  Age (mean ± sd) 38.64 ± 16.28 37.13 ± 14.88 p = 0.50
  Age range 18–73 18–80