Skip to main content
. 2018 May 8;9:483. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00483

Table 1.

A comparison of commonly published skeletal muscle models.

Publication features Vandenburgh et al., 1996 Okano and Matsuda, 1998 Vandenburgh et al., 2008 Chiron et al., 2012 Smith et al., 2012 Martin et al., 2015
Features of published skeletal muscle chambers
Attachment/fixed points Velcro and stainless-steel pins Fixed points Flexible silicone posts Silicone pins Polyethylene mesh Stainless-steel pins
Construct volume 400 μL n/a 100 μL 150 μL 3200 μL 700 μL
Matrix Collagen and matrigel® Collagen Collagen, atrigel® and fibrin Fibrin Collagen Thrombin and fibrin

Matrices type Natural

Seeded cell type C2C12 mouse myoblasts C2C12 mouse myoblasts Primary mouse myoblasts Primary HDMCs Primary rat DMCs C2C12 mouse myoblasts or primary human DMCs
Geometric configuration of chamber Rectangular Mandrel – ring shaped Cylindrical Rectangular Rectangular Circular – then rolled cylindrical tubes
Chamber design type Custom-built Custom-built Manufactured Custom-built Custom-built Custom-built
Chamber/well type Commercially available silicone tubing Agarose gel ring Custom-built wells with posts Custom-built Commercially available singular rectangular wells Custom-built wells with pins

The chambers used for 3D TE have three main corresponding features. (1) They are anchored by fixed point(s). (2) They have a geometric configuration that is rectangular. (3) The chambers are used with a natural (compliant) matrix. The hydrogel matrix/scaffold used for supporting cells varies between the models, as does construct volume, cell type, and seeding density per milliliter (latter not displayed).