Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr;6(8):147. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.17

Table 10. Aripiprazole on QT interval in adults with mental disorders.

Outcome Risk with intervention per 1,000 Risk with comparator per 1,000 Relative measure of association Number of participants (studies) Quality (GRADE) Comments
Aripiprazole versus placebo
   Prolongation of QT interval during the study 0 0 RR undetermined 135 (1 RCT) (90) Very low No difference
   Prolongation of QT interval >30 msec 43 56 RR 0.78 (0.47, 1.28) 1,339 (5 RCTs) (89) Low No difference
   Prolongation of QTc interval >450 msec 2 2 RR 0.89 (0.08, 9.81) 1,339 (5 RCTs) (89) Low No difference
   QTc Bazett >450 msec 142 58 RR 2.43 (0.28, 21.29) 38 (1 RCT) (94) Very low No difference
   QTc Bazett Change from Baseline >30 msec 238 176 RR 1.35 (0.37, 4.86) 38 (1 RCT) (94) Very low No difference
   QTc Bazett Change from Baseline >60 msec 0 58 RR 0.27 (0.01, 6.25) 39 (1 RCT) (94) Very low No difference
   QTcF >450 msec 47 58 RR 0.81 (0.05, 12.01) 38 (1 RCT) (94) Very low No difference
   QTcF change from baseline >30 msec 142 235 RR 0.61 (0.16, 2.35) 38 (1 RCT) (94) Very low No difference
   QTcF change from baseline >60 msec 0 58 RR 0.27 (0.01, 6.25) 39 (1 RCT) (94) Very low No difference
200 versus 300 mg aripiprazole IM Depot
   Electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged 100 133 RR 0.75 (0.08, 7.21) 25 (1 RCT) (96) Very low No difference
200 versus 400 mg aripiprazole IM Depot
   Electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged 100 0 RR 4.20 (0.19, 92.87) 24 (1 RCT) (96) Very low No difference
300 versus 400 mg aripiprazole IM Depot
   Electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged 133 0 RR 4.67 (0.24, 88.96) 29 (1 RCT) (96) Very low No difference
Aripiprazole versus risperidone
   Prolongation of QT interval 0 30 RR 0.07 (0.00, 1.36) 300 (1 RCT) (91) Very low No difference
Aripiprazole versus haloperidol
   Prolongation of QT interval 0 0 RR undetermined 424 (1 RCT) (92) Very low No difference
   Prolongation of QT interval >30 msec 43 80 RR 0.54 (0.31, 0.94) 1,126 (5 RCTs) (89) Low No difference

, we concluded that there is no difference in outcomes between active and control interventions based on P value >0.05 and inability to reject null hypotheses but without post-hoc analysis of the statistical power to detect true differences. 95% confidence interval in (); GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative risk; MD, mean difference; SMD, standardized mean difference between intervention and comparator where the magnitude of the effect is defined as small (SMD, 0–0.5 standard deviations), moderate (SMD, 0.5–0.8 standard deviations), and large (SMD >0.8 standard deviations); QTc, corrected QT interval; QTcF, Fridericia’s corrected QT interval; NR, not reported.