Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr;6(8):147. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.17

Table 2. Risperidone versus active comparators on QT interval in people with mental disorders.

Outcome Risk with intervention per 1,000 Risk with comparator per 1,000 Relative measure of association Number of participants (studies) Quality (GRADE) Comments
Risperidone versus aripiprazole in children and adolescents
   QTc, msec, >18 months NR NR MD −1.20 (−8.94, 6.54); SMD −0.06 (−0.46, 0.33) 99 (prospective analysis registry*) (23) Very low No difference
   QTc >450 msec, or QTc prolongation >60 msec, or QTc dispersion >100 msec; subgroup: concomitant stimulant NR NR Adjusted OR 4.23 (1.10, 17.00) 99 (prospective registry analysis*) (23) Very low Favors aripiprazole
   QTc >500 msec 0 0 RR undetermined 99 (prospective analysis registry*) (23) Very low No difference
Risperidone long-acting Injection versus oral atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole or amisulpride) in adults
   QT prolonged 0 11 RR 0.35 (0.01, 8.56) 167 (1 RCT) (39) Very low No difference
Risperidone or paliperidone versus active control in adults
   Torsades/QT prolongation 18 19 RR 0.94 (0.59, 1.51) 7,573 (64 RCTs) (21) Very low No difference
Risperidone 16 mg/d versus haloperidol 15 mg/d in adults
   QTc >500 msec 0 0 RR Undetermined 52 (1 RCT) (30,38) Very low No difference
Risperidone 4 mg versus risperidone, 2 mg/d + Haloperidol, 2 mg/d in adults
   QTc, msec NR NR MD −1.49 (−14.77, 11.79); SMD −0.06 (−0.57, 0.46) 58 (1 RCT) (28,29) Very low No difference
Risperidone versus olanzapine in adults
   Torsades de Pointes, sudden cardiac death NR NR Adjusted HR 1.04 (0.88, 1.24) 459,614 (1 observational study of medicaid database) (33) Very low No difference
Risperidone versus ziprasidone in adults
   QTc NR NR MD −21.80 (−28.13, −15.47); SMD −2.76 (−3.90, −1.62) 24 (1 RCT) (26,27) Very low Favors risperidone

*, SafEty of NeurolepTics in Infancy and Adolescence (SENTIA) registry (https://sentia.es). , we concluded that there is no difference in outcomes between active and control interventions based on P value >0.05 and inability to reject null hypotheses but without post-hoc analysis of the statistical power to detect true differences. 95% confidence interval in (); GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; OR, odds ratio; NNT, number needed to treat to achieve an outcome in one patient; NNT is calculated as 1/absolute risk difference; attributable events per 1,000 treated as the number of excessive or avoided events per 1000 treated that are attributed to active treatment; attributable events per 1,000 treated are calculated as absolute rate difference multiplied by 1,000; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative risk; MD, mean difference; SMD, standardized mean difference between intervention and comparator where the magnitude of the effect is defined as small (SMD, 0–0.5 standard deviations), moderate (SMD, 0.5–0.8 standard deviations), and large (SMD >0.8 standard deviations); QTc, corrected QT interval; NR, not reported.