. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 14.

Published in final edited form as: Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed). 2017 Jan 19;2016:1714–1719. doi: 10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822776

Table 1.

Comparison between Multi-DP-TOSS and the Low-weight Set approach.

ID^a	Helices^b	Sticks^c	Top^d	TimeD^e	TimeH^f	RankingH^g	RankingD^h
3LTJ	16	12	40/100	94.3 s	1.35 s	2	2
1BJ7	14	10	97/100	7.9 s	0.16 s	6	6
1FLP	7	7	100/100	4.2 s	0.03 s	2	2
1ICX	12	10	81/100	1.1 s	26.27 s	2	2
5030	7	7	100/100	18.2 s	.13 s	1	1
1HZ4	21	19	0/100	1625 s	N/A	N/A	15
3ODS	21	16	2/100	215.5 s	N/A	N/A	>100

The PDB ID with chain;

The number of detected helices in the sequence;

The number of detected helices (sticks) in the image;

The number paths found that are in the top 100 best paths determined using Multi-DP-TOSS;

The time taken in seconds to find the paths displayed in column four^d;

The time needed to find the true path by the heuristic method in seconds; N/A: not found

The ranking of the true path by the heuristic method; N/A: the true path not ranked within top 100.

The ranking of the true path by the deterministic method using Multi-DP-TOSS [20];