Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 2;15(6):4979–4986. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6025

Table II.

Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the overall survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

A, Training group (n=100)

Clinicopathological feature P-value HR (95% CI)
Age (≥60 vs. <60 years) 0.120 1.532 (0.895–2.621)
Gender (male vs. female) 0.267 0.734 (0.425–1.267)
T stage (T3-T4 vs. T1-T2) 0.097 1.664 (0.911–3.040)
Lymph node (N3-N4 vs. N0-N2) 0.092 1.601 (0.926–2.767)
Metastasis (positive vs. negative) 0.368 1.399 (0.673–2.906)
TNM stage (III–IV vs. I–II) 0.619 1.163 (0.641–2.112)
Grade (III+IV vs. I+II) 0.064 1.6681 (0.970–2.913)
CD103expression (high vs. low) 0.001 0.365 (0.205–0.648)

B, Testing group (n=100)

Clinicopathological feature P-value HR (95% CI)

Age (≥60 vs. <60 years) 0.995 0.998 (0.535–1.861)
Gender (male vs. female) 0.555 1.211 (0.641–2.288)
T stage (T3-T4 vs. T1-T2) 0.946 1.000 (0.549–1.820)
Lymph node (N3-N4 vs. N0-N2) 0.063 1.801 (0.968–3.349)
Metastasis (positive vs. negative) 0.595 0.804 (0.360–1.795)
TNM stage (III–IV vs. I–II) 0.776 0.910 (0.475–1.743)
Grade (III+IV vs. I+II) 0.233 1.460 (0.784–2.718)
CD103 expression (high vs. low) 0.003 0.391 (0.210–0.728)

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; CD, cluster of differentiation.