Table 3.
Variables | AUC | p value | Cut-off value | Sensitivity | Specificity | 95% CI for AUC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | ||||||
Lg PCT at admission | 0.738 | <0.001 | 0.26 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.657 | 0.820 |
WBC at admission | 0.706 | <0.001 | 9.30 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.623 | 0.789 |
Hemorrhage | 0.640 | 0.004 | – | – | – | 0.549 | 0.731 |
Combinationa | 0.785 | <0.001 | 0.49b | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.710 | 0.861 |
AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; P-value for calculated AUC in predicting severity; CI, confidence interval; Sensitivity, specificity and 95% CI are all presented as percentages; WBC, white blood counts; LgPCT, procalcitonin after log10 transformation.
LgPCT, WBC, and the occurrence of hemorrhage in combination.
Probability value of the combination was analyzed by logistic regression. The regression coefficients of these three parameters were used to set up a logit model for the progression of HFRS as follows: Logit(P|y = severe type) = −2.223+0.079LgPCT +0.934WBC+0.765Hemorrhage.