Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 29;7(1):346–357. doi: 10.1039/c5sc03530a

Table 2. Principal g and copper hyperfine values of the mononuclear CuII complexes in the different reaction mixtures heated to 100 °C a .

Entry [CuI] (M) Heating time g x ± 0.002 g y ± 0.002 g z ± 0.001 |Ax| (MHz) ± 15 |Ay| (MHz) ± 15 |Az| (MHz) ± 5
1 CuI/DMSO 0.05 10′ I 2.082 2.087 2.405 45 55 385
2 CuI/DMSO/AcOH 0.05 10′ I′ 2.081 2.083 2.403 26 25 375
II 2.080 2.080 2.374 30 26 430
3 CuI/DMSO/AcOH/(1) 0.05 5′ III b 2.070 2.070 2.333 25 25 440
IV 2.062 2.063 2.286 35 35 510
4 CuI/DMSO/AcOH/(1) 0.05 10′ III b 2.070 2.070 2.333 25 25 440
IV 2.062 2.063 2.286 35 35 510
5 CuI/DMSO/AcOH/(1) 0.05 1 h IV 2.063 2.063 2.285 30 30 510
6 CuI/DMSO/AcOH/(1) 0.05 4 h IV′ 2.063 2.063 2.290 30 30 505
V 2.067 2.067 2.262 35 35 560
7 CuI/DMSO/AcOH/(1) 0.25 10′ IV 2.066 2.066 2.286 35 35 510
III c 2.072 2.072 2.330 25 25 450
8 CuI/DMSO/AcOH/(1) 0.25 4 h IV 2.062 2.063 2.285 35 35 510
III c 2.075 2.072 2.334 25 25 455

aThe relative contributions of the different species to the experimental spectra are given in the ESI.

bFor the simulation of the contribution of species III in reaction mixture with starting concentration [CuI] = 0.05 M, the interaction with two 14N nuclei with a isotropic hyperfine coupling of 40 ± 5 MHz had to be taken into account.

cThe 14N hyperfine interaction was not resolved due to the increased linewidth, but was considered in the simulation.