. 2015 Oct 22;7(1):781–787. doi: 10.1039/c5sc03097h

Table 1. X-ray photoemission spectroscopy derived effective thickness and packing density of TP1, TP1-up and TP1-down SAMs; X-ray absorption spectroscopy derived tilt angles; WF shifts with respect to pristine gold ^c .

SAM	Effective thickness (nm)	Packing density (molecules per cm²)	Tilt angle	WF shift ^a (eV)
TP1	1.78 ± 0.04	4.6 × 10¹⁴	18 ± 3°	0.98
TP1-up	1.74 ± 0.05	4.2 × 10¹⁴	18 ± 3°	1.41(+0.43 ^b )
TP1-down	1.75 ± 0.05	4.3 × 10¹⁴	17 ± 3°	0.43(–0.55 ^b )

^aMeasured with a Kelvin probe; we use opposite sign conventions for Φ.

^bDifference from TP1.

^cExperimental values are from ref. 42.

Table 1. X-ray photoemission spectroscopy derived effective thickness and packing density of TP1, TP1-up and TP1-down SAMs; X-ray absorption spectroscopy derived tilt angles; WF shifts with respect to pristine gold c .