Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 16;7(1):719–727. doi: 10.1039/c5sc01565k

Table 2. Summary of JV results a .

J SC (mA cm–2) V OC (V) FF η (%)
TiO2 –0.132 ± 0.001 –0.451 ± 0.010 0.57 ± 0.05 0.034 ± 0.011
RuDCBPY–TiO2 –0.203 ± 0.051 –0.364 ± 0.047 0.46 ± 0.01 0.077 ± 0.010
UiO-67–DCBPY–TiO2 –0.180 ± 0.003 –0.471 ± 0.036 0.59 ± 0.03 0.049 ± 0.005
RuBPY@UiO-67–TiO2 –0.175 ± 0.068 –0.455 ± 0.072 0.57 ± 0.06 0.045 ± 0.015
RuDCBPY–UiO-67–TiO2 –0.446 ± 0.097 –0.480 ± 0.019 0.55 ± 0.04 0.123 ± 0.021
RuDCBPY–UiO-67–DCBPY-OP–TiO2 –0.251 ± 0.025 –0.420 ± 0.026 0.44 ± 0.06 0.046 ± 0.005
RuDCBPY–UiO-67–DCBPY-PS–TiO2 –0.028 ± 0.005 –0.324 ± 0.035 0.41 ± 0.05 0.004 ± 0.001
RuDCBPY–ZrMOF–TiO2 –0.564 ± 0.129 –0.482 ± 0.035 0.47 ± 0.04 0.125 ± 0.038

aAverage values and errors shown are based on at least 3 trials.