Skip to main content
. 2018 May 1;24(5):344–350. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0120

Table 1.

Sensitivity and Specificity for Diagnosing Optic Disc Edema Using Fundus Photos Compared with the Standard Clinical Examination (n = 206 Eyes)

  STANDARD CLINICAL EXAMINATION    
DIAGNOSIS WITH PHOTO EDEMA NO EDEMA SENSITIVITY (95% CI) SPECIFICITY (95% CI)
Grader 1
 Present, likely present, uncertain 95 19 92.2 (95.4–96.0) 81.6 (73.0–87.9)
 Likely absent, absent 8 84
 Present, likely present, uncertain, likely absent 101 42 98.1 (93.2–99.5) 59.2 (49.6–68.2)
 Absent 2 61
Grader 2
 Present, likely present, uncertain 74 5 71.8 (62.5–79.6) 95.2 (89.1–98.9)
 Likely absent, absent 29 98
 Present, likely present, uncertain, likely absent 83 8 80.6 (71.9–87.1) 92.2 (85.4–96.0)
 Absent 20 95
Grader 3
 Present, likely present, uncertain 82 7 79.6 (70.8–86.3) 93.2 (86.6–96.7)
 Likely absent, absent 21 96
 Present, likely present, uncertain, likely absent 95 20 92.2 (85.4–96.0) 80.6 (71.9–87.1)
 Absent 8 83
Grader 4
 Present, likely present, uncertain 89 16 86.4 (78.5–91.7) 84.5 (76.3–90.2)
 Likely absent, absent 14 87
 Present, likely present, uncertain, likely absent 98 39 95.2 (89.1–97.9) 62.1 (52.5–70.9)
 Absent 5 64

CI, confidence interval.