Skip to main content
. 2018 May 1;24(5):344–350. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0120

Table 3.

Intragrader Reliability for the Diagnosis of Optic Disc Edema

  GROUPING 1a KAPPA (95% CI) GROUPING 2b KAPPA (95% CI)
Grader 1 0.89 (0.75–1.00) 0.52 (0.23–0.81)
Grader 2 0.85 (0.65–1.00) 0.62 (0.35–0.90)
Grader 3 0.76 (0.51–1.00) 0.77 (0.54–1.00)
Grader 4 0.76 (0.52–1.00) 0.83 (0.60–1.00)
a

Presence of optic disc edema was defined as a response of “present,” “likely present,” or “uncertain” versus “likely absent” or “absent.”

b

Presence of optic disc edema was defined as a response of “present,” “likely present,” “uncertain,” “likely absent” versus “absent.”