Table 3.

Generalized estimating equations predicting youth and caregiver satisfaction with visits (N=359)

Youth satisfaction with visit	Beta (95% confidence interval)
Independent variables
Youth gender – male	0.1 (−1.0, 1.2)
Youth age	0.1 (−0.2, 0.4)
Youth race – White	−0.6 (−1.7, 0.5)
Youth rating of provider’s participatory decision-making style	4.9 (3.3, 6.5)***
Asthma severity – moderate/severe	−0.1 (−1.7, 1.7)
Language spoken at home – Spanish	−1.9 (−3.4, −0.4)*
Years living with asthma	0.3 (−0.9, 1.5)
Whether youth was in intervention or usual care group	0.3 (−0.9, 1.5)
Caregiver rating of how well the provider knows the child	1.0 (−0.2, 2.3)
Provider age	−0.06 (−0.11, −0.01)*
Provider race – White	−0.8 (−2.4, 0.9)
Provider gender – female	0.9 (−0.3, 2.2)
Caregiver satisfaction with visit
Independent variables
Caregiver age	−0.1 (−0.2, 0.1)
Caregiver race – White	0.3 (−2.5, 3.1)
Caregiver gender	3.4 (−8.5, 1.7)
Caregiver education (in years)	−0.04 (−0.5, 0.4)
Caregiver rating of provider’s participatory decision-making style	7.5 (3.1, 12.0)**
Asthma severity – moderate/severe	−2.3 (−4.9, 0.3)
Language spoken at home – Spanish	−8.7 (−16.2, −1.3)*
Years living with asthma	−0.3 (−0.7, 0.1)
Whether youth was in intervention or usual care group	−1.8 (−4.1, 0.5)
Caregiver rating of how well the provider knows the child	3.7 (1.5, 5.8)**
Provider age	0.1 (−0.5, 0.3)
Provider race – White	1.0 (−2.6, 4.5)
Provider gender – female	−1.1 (−4.8, 2.7)

Notes:

^*p<0.05,

^**p<0.01,

^***p<0.001.