Skip to main content
. 2018 May 8;9:424. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00424

Table 4.

Summary of findings table: the three most important patients outcomes are listed in the summary of findings table.

4.1 EIH vs. Antihypertensive drugs
Patients or population: patients with essential hypertension
Settings: in adult patients
Intervention: EIH
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) No of Participants (studies) Quality of the evidence (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk control Corresponding risk EIH
Systolic blood pressure The mean systolic blood pressure ranged across control groups from 134.24 to 151.2 mmHg The mean systolic blood pressure in the intervention groups was 0 higher (2.3 lower to 1.43 higher) 606(5 studies) ⊕⊕⊖⊖low
Diastolic blood pressure The mean distolic blood pressure ranged across control groups from 84.4 to 92.4 mmHg The mean diastolic blood pressure in the intervention groups was 0.02 lower(1.13 lower to 1.09 higher) 606(5 studies) ⊕⊕⊖⊖low
Left ventricular mass index The mean left ventricular mass index ranged across control groups from 91.41 to 122.2 g/m2 The mean left ventricular mass index in the intervention groups was 1.36 lower(4.99 lower to 2.26 higher) 85(2 studies) ⊕⊕⊖⊖low
4.2 EIH plus Antihypertensive drugs vs. Antihypertensive drugs
Patients or population: patients with essential hypertension
Settings: in adult patients
Intervention: EIH plus Antihypertensive drugs
Systolic blood pressure The mean systolic blood pressure of the control group in single study was 131.8 mmHg The mean systolic blood pressure in the intervention group was 8.5 lower(11.99 to 5.01 lower) 166(1 study) ⊕⊕⊖⊖low
Diastolic blood pressure The mean diastolic blood pressure of the control group in single study was 82.5 mmHg The mean diastolic blood pressure in the intervention group was 8.7 lower(11.49 to 5.91 lower) 166(1 study) ⊕⊕⊖⊖low
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.
*

The basis for the assumed risk (e.g., the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval.