Skip to main content
. 2018 May 8;9:184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00184

Table 2.

Indirect effects of Emotional Intelligence (EI) on suicide risk through psychological distress controlling for age and gender.

Total effect model Indirect effect model
Path B SE t B SE t BCa 95% CI
Agea 0.01 0.01 1.24 0.02 0.01 1.65
Gendera 0.11 0.24 0.48 0.19 0.23 0.82
EI – distress (a) −3.66 0.38 −9.56***
distress – suicide risk (b) 0.08 0.02 5.08***
EI – suicide risk (c) −0.90 0.13 −7.18***
EI – suicide risk (c′) −0.62 0.13 −4.59***
EI - distress – suicide risk (ab) −0.28 0.08 [−0.46, −0.15]
R2 0.11 0.16
F (df) 17.61*** (3, 434) 20.42*** (4, 433)

EI, Emotional Intelligence; distress, psychological distress symptoms. N = 438. a, b, c, and c′ represent unstandardized regression coefficients: a, direct association between Emotional Intelligence and suicidal behavior; b, direct association between psychological distress and suicidal behavior; c, total effect between Emotional Intelligence and suicidal behavior (not accounting for psychological distress); c′, direct effect between Emotional Intelligence and suicidal behavior (accounting for psychological distress); ab, indirect effect between Emotional Intelligence and suicidal behavior operating through psychological distress. Full mediation, c is reduced by ab to a non-significant c′; partial mediation, c is reduced by ab, but c′ remains significant; indirect only, ab, but no c and no c' initially. BCa 95% CI, bias corrected and accelerated 95% confidence interval; 5,000 bootstrap samples.

a

Age and sex were covaried.

***

p < 0.001.