Skip to main content
. 2018 May 15;378:71–88. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.09.026

Table 3.

Number of significant between-target level contrasts and correlations of single-trial beta values and target levels separately for the two type-of-training conditions per participant

Participant No-Feedback condition
Feedback condition
Number of significant contrasts Correlation of single-trial beta values and target levels Number of significant contrasts Correlation of single-trial beta values and target levels
P01 2 0.188 3 (+) 0.745∗∗ (↑)
P02 1 −0.083 2 (+) 0.355 (↑)
P03 2 0.415∗∗ 2 (=) 0.677∗∗ (↑)
P04 2 0.094 2 (=) 0.402∗∗ (↑)
P05 1 −0.326(∗∗) 1 (=) -0.152 (↑)
P06 2 0.287 3 (+) 0.411∗∗ (↑)
P07 3 0.778∗∗ 3 (=) 0.824∗∗ (↑)
P08 2 0.455∗∗ 3 (+) 0.495∗∗ (↑)
P09 2 0.531∗∗ 2 (=) 0.41∗∗ (↓)
P10 2 0.501∗∗ 2 (=) 0.266 (↓)
Mean 1.9 0.284 2.3 0.443

Remarks:*p < 0.05 (desired direction); **p < 0.001 (desired direction); (**)p < 0.001 (undesirable direction); participants with a black underline underwent feedback condition first and no-feedback condition second; (↑) or (↓) indicates a higher or a lower correlation coefficient in the feedback condition (vs. in the no-feedback condition); (+) or (=) indicates more or the same number of significant between-target level contrasts.