Skip to main content
. 2018 May 15;13(5):e0196272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196272

Table 1. Summary of findings for main outcomes (Analysis I: Random effects model, 14 studies).

Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect Number of Participants Quality of evidence Comments
(95% CI) (studies) (GRADE)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control Autism general symptoms
Autism general symptoms Mean “autism general symptoms” was 0 Mean “autism general symptoms” in the intervention groups was 0.31 SD lower (−0.63–0.01 higher) SMD −0.31 (−0.63–0.01) 227 ⊕⊕⊕⊝
(3 studies) moderate2
Developmental quotient Mean “developmental quotient” was 0 Mean “developmental quotient” in the intervention groups was 0.31 SD higher (−0.02–0.65 higher) SMD 0.31 (−0.02–0.65)* 208* ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Results of sensitivity analysis excluding studies with a significant baseline imbalance
(4 studies) moderate2
Expressive language Mean “expressive language” was 0 Mean “expressive language” in the intervention groups was 0.11 SD higher (−0.07–0.3 higher) SMD 0.11 (−0.07–0.3) 457 ⊕⊕⊕⊝
(8 studies) moderate1
Receptive language Mean “receptive language” was 0 Mean “receptive language” in the intervention groups was 0.12 SD higher (−0.11–0.34 higher) SMD 0.12 (−0.11–0.34) 457 ⊕⊕⊕⊝
(8 studies) moderate1
Reciprocity of social interaction towards others Mean “reciprocity of social interaction towards others” was 0 Mean “reciprocity of social interaction towards others” in the intervention group was 0.53 SD higher (0.29 more–0.78 more) SMD 0.53 (0.29–0.78) 380 ⊕⊕⊕⊕
(8 studies) High
Adaptive behaviour Mean “adaptive behaviour” was 0 Mean “adaptive behaviour” in the intervention group was −0.04 SD higher (−0.23 more–0.15 more) SMD −0.04 (−0.23–0.15) 414 ⊕⊕⊕⊝
(7 studies) moderate1

Interventions for pre-school children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Population: Pre-school children aged 6 years or younger with a diagnosis of ASD. Settings: Australia, Canada, Japan, Norway, UK and USA. Intervention: Interventions for pre-school children with ASD

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; GRADE: Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation; SMD: standard mean difference; SD: standard deviation.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence

High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Small sample size with wide CI crossing the line of no effect.

2 Estimate based on small sample size.