Skip to main content
. 2018 May 15;13(5):e0197367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197367

Fig 1. General diagram of the proposed classification methodology.

Fig 1

Data processing is composed of four major steps. A) Feature extraction is focused on the estimation of a matrix of time-frequency HRV markers (RMN, with N = 105 patients and M = 60 different HRV features), using a time-varying frequency band that depends on the estimated instantaneous respiratory rate. B) Feature conditioning consists on standardizing and balancing RMN, leading to matrices FMN and FMNb, respectively, where Nb refers to the 160 observations after class balancing (79 symptomatic and 81 asymptomatic samples). C) Feature selection, which starts by randomly defining patient subsets for training, (Ntr, 75% of patients, 59 symptomatic and 60 asymptomatic) and testing (Nte, the rest of patients, 20 symptomatic and 21 asymptomatic), followed by the estimation of a minimal feature dimension Mw < M, that maximizes classification performance, using filtering and wrapper methods. D) The final step is dedicated to classification and performance evaluation.