Table 2. Analysis of the Electrochemical and Electronic Properties of the Copolymers.
polymer | reduction onseta (V) | C/A (F/cm2)b | thickness (nm) | C* (F/cm3)c | μel OFETe (cm2/(V s)) | μel OECTd (cm2/(V s)) | normalized gm (S/cm)f |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P-0 | –1.1 | 5.46 × 10–5 | 35 | - | 0.132 | - | - |
P-10 | –1.1 | 5.17 × 10–5 | 41 | - | 0.0514 | - | - |
P-25 | –0.43* | 2.10 × 10–4 | 39 | - | 0.00184 | - | - |
P-50 | –0.33 | 5.46 × 10–4 | 31 | - | - | - | 0.067 (31 nm) |
P-75 | –0.26 | 8.62 × 10–4 | 39 | 188.0 | - | 1.46 × 10–4 | 0.141 (39 nm) |
P-90 | –0.25 | 8.30 × 10–4 | 40 | 198.2 | - | 2.38 × 10–4 | 0.210 (52 nm) |
P-100 | –0.24 | 8.62 × 10–4 | 41 | 192.4 | - | 1.96 × 10–4 | 0.204 (28 nm) |
Measurements were carried out in degassed 0.1 M NaCl aqueous solution vs Ag/AgCl, * observation of an additional reduction peak at >1.1 V.
The detailed EIS analysis is presented in Figure S26; the electrode area is 3.48 × 10–3 cm2 with an offset voltage of −0.6 V vs Ag/AgCl. The capacitance values here represent the effective capacitance at 1 Hz.
The capacitance values used to extract C* are from fits of EIS data to a Randle’s circuit (Rs(Rp∥C).
Electron mobility extracted from OFET (output and transfer curves are presented in the Figure S29).
Device dimensions W = 100 μm, L = 10 μm with the indicated thickness; transconductance is normalized by thickness. OECTs were fabricated and characterized as previously reported.7