Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Dec 26;24(5):1057–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.12.791

Table 5.

Potential 8/8 URD Availability After CT Request Stratified by Patient Ancestry*, N = 3,353 URDs

Patient Ancestry N URDs Pursued for CT For Each Patient Group* N URDs Available for CT Patient Ancestry p-value
Total: 3,353 2,040 (61%) —
European
(n = 558 patients) 		2,618 1,682 (64%) < 0.001
Non-European
(n = 268 patients) 		726 352 (48%)
Ancestry Subtype — — —
NW European 869 575 (66%) —
Eastern European 793 498 (63%) —
Southern European 277 186 (67%) —
European Mix 672 413 (61%) —
Asian 166 71 (43%) —
African 148 58 (39%) —
White Hispanic 193 89 (46%) —
Middle Eastern 47 31 (66%) —
Mixed Non-European 175 109 (62%) —
*

9 URDs were excluded from the European versus non-European analysis as the European versus non-European ancestry was not determined for 4 patients. Also, 13 URDs were excluded from ancestry subtype analysis due to undetermined ancestry subtype in a total of 7 patients.