Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;5:11. doi: 10.1186/s40658-018-0209-8

Table 5.

Comparison of the calibration factors obtained with standard method and image-based FAF method, computed on patient data

Patient SFAF (cps/MBq) Rel. diff. with Sstd(%) Arms in same position
1 1335 -1.29 Yes
2 1411 4.19 No
3 1374 1.58 No
4 1481 8.72 No
5 1347 -0.39 Yes
6 1486 9.00 No